PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDF vs. DDLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDF vs. DDLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) and WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDF achieves a 19.66% return, which is significantly higher than DDLS's 6.60% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDF has outperformed DDLS with an annualized return of 12.34%, while DDLS has yielded a comparatively lower 10.19% annualized return.


FNDF

1D
0.39%
1M
2.91%
YTD
19.66%
6M
21.60%
1Y
41.60%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
13.11%
10Y*
12.34%

DDLS

1D
0.15%
1M
0.68%
YTD
6.60%
6M
8.68%
1Y
22.28%
3Y*
16.89%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
10.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDF vs. DDLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
19.66%40.99%2.29%20.22%-7.78%14.97%3.61%18.46%-14.21%23.98%
DDLS
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund
6.60%27.97%10.22%15.25%-10.13%17.75%-2.95%24.84%-16.92%26.91%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDF and DDLS is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2016

0.80

The correlation between FNDF and DDLS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDF vs. DDLS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNDF
DDLS

Financial Services

16.2%
12.9%

Industrials

15.5%
25.1%

Technology

14.4%
7.8%

Basic Materials

11.3%
8.0%

Energy

10.9%
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
5.9%

Healthcare

5.2%
2.7%

Communication Services

4.9%
3.7%

Utilities

3.5%
2.0%

Real Estate

0.8%
6.3%

Financial Services

FNDF
16.2%
DDLS
12.9%

Industrials

FNDF
15.5%
DDLS
25.1%

Technology

FNDF
14.4%
DDLS
7.8%

Basic Materials

FNDF
11.3%
DDLS
8.0%

Energy

FNDF
10.9%
DDLS
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FNDF
10.8%
DDLS
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

FNDF
6.5%
DDLS
5.9%

Healthcare

FNDF
5.2%
DDLS
2.7%

Communication Services

FNDF
4.9%
DDLS
3.7%

Utilities

FNDF
3.5%
DDLS
2.0%

Real Estate

FNDF
0.8%
DDLS
6.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDF vs. DDLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDF
FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

DDLS
DDLS Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
DDLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDLS Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
DDLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDLS Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDF vs. DDLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) and WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNDFDDLSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.30

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

2.03

+1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.27

7.42

+6.84

FNDF vs. DDLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDF Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the DDLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDF and DDLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNDF vs. DDLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDF drawdown since its inception was -40.14%, which is greater than DDLS's maximum drawdown of -36.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDF and DDLS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDFDDLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.14%

-36.80%

-3.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.60%

-10.69%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.89%

-11.66%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.56%

-19.87%

-5.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.14%

-36.80%

-3.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.94%

-2.39%

+0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.63%

-5.70%

-1.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

2.92%

-0.08%

Volatility

FNDF vs. DDLS - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) has a higher volatility of 6.65% compared to WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS) at 4.55%. This indicates that FNDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DDLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDFDDLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.65%

4.55%

+2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.64%

11.06%

+2.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.00%

13.26%

+2.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.35%

13.82%

+2.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.71%

15.60%

+2.11%

FNDF vs. DDLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDF has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DDLS's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNDF vs. DDLS - Dividend Comparison

FNDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, less than DDLS's 3.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDLS
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund
3.52%3.80%4.11%4.05%5.44%3.18%3.16%3.68%1.75%1.60%3.47%0.00%
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
2.87%3.44%4.01%3.41%3.10%3.54%2.17%3.20%3.47%2.32%2.42%2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNDF and DDLS have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNDF has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to DDLS (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDF dropped -40.14% vs DDLS's -36.80%.

On 10-year performance, FNDF leads with 12.34% vs 10.19% for DDLS. On fees, FNDF is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DDLS has been the lower-risk option at 4.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNDF has performed better with a 12.34% return vs 10.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNDF is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DDLS.

DDLS has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 2.87% for FNDF.

FNDF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DDLS is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. FNDF tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net), while DDLS tracks WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDF and 0.48% for DDLS.

FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDF and DDLS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer