FNDF vs. AVUV
FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF) and AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FNDF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net), while AVUV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. FNDF is passively managed, while AVUV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FNDF returned 13.11%/yr vs 11.57%/yr for AVUV. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
FNDF vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDF achieves a 19.66% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 22.73% return.
FNDF
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 19.66%
- 6M
- 21.60%
- 1Y
- 41.60%
- 3Y*
- 22.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.11%
- 10Y*
- 12.34%
AVUV
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 5.11%
- YTD
- 22.73%
- 6M
- 19.51%
- 1Y
- 42.12%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- 11.57%
- 10Y*
- —
FNDF vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF | 19.66% | 40.99% | 2.29% | 20.22% | -7.78% | 14.97% | 3.61% | 7.64% |
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 22.73% | 7.44% | 9.28% | 22.82% | -4.91% | 42.20% | 6.43% | 8.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDF and AVUV is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019 | 0.74 |
The correlation between FNDF and AVUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
FNDF vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FNDF
AVUV
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
FNDF
AVUV
Industrials
FNDF
AVUV
Technology
FNDF
AVUV
Basic Materials
FNDF
AVUV
Energy
FNDF
AVUV
Consumer Cyclical
FNDF
AVUV
Consumer Defensive
FNDF
AVUV
Healthcare
FNDF
AVUV
Communication Services
FNDF
AVUV
Utilities
FNDF
AVUV
Real Estate
FNDF
AVUV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNDF vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank
FNDF
AVUV
FNDF vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNDF | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.39 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.82 | 5.06 | -1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.27 | 15.09 | -0.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNDF vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDF drawdown since its inception was -40.14%, smaller than the maximum AVUV drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDF and AVUV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDF | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.14% | -49.42% | +9.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.60% | -7.95% | -2.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.89% | -28.79% | +14.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.56% | -28.79% | +3.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.94% | 0.00% | -1.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.63% | -7.91% | +0.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 2.67% | +0.17% |
Volatility
FNDF vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) has a higher volatility of 6.65% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) at 4.53%. This indicates that FNDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNDF | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.65% | 4.53% | +2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.64% | 11.34% | +2.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.00% | 17.63% | -1.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.35% | 22.75% | -6.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.71% | 28.26% | -10.55% |
FNDF vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FNDF and AVUV have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FNDF vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison
FNDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than AVUV's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 1.61% | 1.58% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.74% | 1.28% | 1.21% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF | 2.87% | 3.44% | 4.01% | 3.41% | 3.10% | 3.54% | 2.17% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 2.32% | 2.42% | 2.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNDF and AVUV have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNDF has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to AVUV (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDF dropped -40.14% vs AVUV's -49.42%.
On 5-year performance, FNDF leads with 13.11% vs 11.57% for AVUV. Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 4.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FNDF has performed better with a 13.11% return vs 11.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FNDF and AVUV have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
FNDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 1.61% for AVUV.
FNDF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Avantis.
FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNDF and AVUV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer