PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDF vs. AVUV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDF vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDF achieves a 19.66% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 22.73% return.


FNDF

1D
0.39%
1M
0.88%
YTD
19.66%
6M
21.60%
1Y
41.60%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
13.11%
10Y*
12.34%

AVUV

1D
0.96%
1M
5.11%
YTD
22.73%
6M
19.51%
1Y
42.12%
3Y*
19.24%
5Y*
11.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDF vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
19.66%40.99%2.29%20.22%-7.78%14.97%3.61%7.64%
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
22.73%7.44%9.28%22.82%-4.91%42.20%6.43%8.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDF and AVUV is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019

0.74

The correlation between FNDF and AVUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDF vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNDF
AVUV

Financial Services

16.2%
26.1%

Industrials

15.5%
13.6%

Technology

14.4%
7.4%

Basic Materials

11.3%
5.1%

Energy

10.9%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
18.7%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
4.7%

Healthcare

5.2%
4.8%

Communication Services

4.9%
3.1%

Utilities

3.5%
0.1%

Real Estate

0.8%
0.7%

Financial Services

FNDF
16.2%
AVUV
26.1%

Industrials

FNDF
15.5%
AVUV
13.6%

Technology

FNDF
14.4%
AVUV
7.4%

Basic Materials

FNDF
11.3%
AVUV
5.1%

Energy

FNDF
10.9%
AVUV
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FNDF
10.8%
AVUV
18.7%

Consumer Defensive

FNDF
6.5%
AVUV
4.7%

Healthcare

FNDF
5.2%
AVUV
4.8%

Communication Services

FNDF
4.9%
AVUV
3.1%

Utilities

FNDF
3.5%
AVUV
0.1%

Real Estate

FNDF
0.8%
AVUV
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDF vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDF
FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

AVUV
AVUV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
AVUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDF vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNDFAVUVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.39

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

5.06

-1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.27

15.09

-0.82

FNDF vs. AVUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDF Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the AVUV Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDF and AVUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNDF vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDF drawdown since its inception was -40.14%, smaller than the maximum AVUV drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDF and AVUV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDFAVUVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.14%

-49.42%

+9.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.60%

-7.95%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.89%

-28.79%

+14.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.56%

-28.79%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.94%

0.00%

-1.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.63%

-7.91%

+0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

2.67%

+0.17%

Volatility

FNDF vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) has a higher volatility of 6.65% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) at 4.53%. This indicates that FNDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDFAVUVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.65%

4.53%

+2.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.64%

11.34%

+2.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.00%

17.63%

-1.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.35%

22.75%

-6.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.71%

28.26%

-10.55%

FNDF vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FNDF and AVUV have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FNDF vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison

FNDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than AVUV's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
1.61%1.58%1.61%1.65%1.74%1.28%1.21%0.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
2.87%3.44%4.01%3.41%3.10%3.54%2.17%3.20%3.47%2.32%2.42%2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNDF and AVUV have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNDF has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to AVUV (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDF dropped -40.14% vs AVUV's -49.42%.

On 5-year performance, FNDF leads with 13.11% vs 11.57% for AVUV. Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 4.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FNDF has performed better with a 13.11% return vs 11.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNDF and AVUV have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

FNDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 1.61% for AVUV.

FNDF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Avantis.

FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDF and AVUV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer