PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDE vs. PXF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDE vs. PXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDE achieves a 13.70% return, which is significantly lower than PXF's 18.79% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDE has underperformed PXF with an annualized return of 11.35%, while PXF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.26% annualized return.


FNDE

1D
0.66%
1M
-0.85%
YTD
13.70%
6M
15.79%
1Y
29.82%
3Y*
19.78%
5Y*
9.29%
10Y*
11.35%

PXF

1D
0.34%
1M
0.89%
YTD
18.79%
6M
20.98%
1Y
39.76%
3Y*
23.81%
5Y*
13.18%
10Y*
12.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDE vs. PXF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF
13.70%29.46%12.10%14.99%-15.58%14.41%-2.77%19.75%-10.37%26.77%
PXF
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF
18.79%42.51%4.54%18.46%-9.09%15.93%2.58%17.50%-14.84%24.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDE and PXF is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013

0.78

The correlation between FNDE and PXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDE vs. PXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNDE
PXF

Financial Services

23.8%
19.7%

Technology

18.7%
11.4%

Energy

15.5%
10.6%

Basic Materials

13.6%
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
10.2%

Communication Services

6.6%
4.3%

Industrials

4.7%
15.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
6.1%

Utilities

2.5%
3.6%

Real Estate

1.5%
1.8%

Healthcare

0.5%
7.2%

Financial Services

FNDE
23.8%
PXF
19.7%

Technology

FNDE
18.7%
PXF
11.4%

Energy

FNDE
15.5%
PXF
10.6%

Basic Materials

FNDE
13.6%
PXF
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FNDE
9.5%
PXF
10.2%

Communication Services

FNDE
6.6%
PXF
4.3%

Industrials

FNDE
4.7%
PXF
15.1%

Consumer Defensive

FNDE
3.1%
PXF
6.1%

Utilities

FNDE
2.5%
PXF
3.6%

Real Estate

FNDE
1.5%
PXF
1.8%

Healthcare

FNDE
0.5%
PXF
7.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDE vs. PXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDE
FNDE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FNDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDE Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

PXF
PXF Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXF Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
PXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXF Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDE vs. PXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNDEPXFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.45

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

3.66

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.67

13.76

-3.08

FNDE vs. PXF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDE Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the PXF Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDE and PXF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNDE vs. PXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDE drawdown since its inception was -43.55%, smaller than the maximum PXF drawdown of -64.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDE and PXF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDEPXFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.55%

-64.74%

+21.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.23%

-10.91%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.40%

-14.06%

-4.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.44%

-26.82%

-2.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.93%

-41.59%

+1.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.19%

-2.04%

-1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.69%

-15.25%

+3.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

2.90%

-0.10%

Volatility

FNDE vs. PXF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE) is 6.30%, while Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) has a volatility of 6.76%. This indicates that FNDE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDEPXFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.30%

6.76%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.07%

13.95%

-0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.61%

16.18%

-0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.01%

16.62%

+0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.30%

18.07%

+1.23%

FNDE vs. PXF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PXF's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNDE vs. PXF - Dividend Comparison

FNDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than PXF's 3.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF
3.68%4.19%4.82%4.74%5.59%4.32%2.50%3.47%2.98%2.05%1.65%2.02%
PXF
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF
3.12%3.64%3.48%3.55%3.58%3.74%2.11%3.50%3.38%2.78%3.21%3.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNDE and PXF have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PXF has higher volatility (6.76%) compared to FNDE (6.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDE dropped -43.55% vs PXF's -64.74%.

On 10-year performance, PXF leads with 12.26% vs 11.35% for FNDE. On fees, FNDE is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FNDE has been the lower-risk option at 6.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PXF has performed better with a 12.26% return vs 11.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNDE is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PXF.

FNDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 3.12% for PXF.

FNDE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while PXF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. FNDE tracks Russell Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index, while PXF tracks FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FNDE and 0.45% for PXF.

PXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDE and PXF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer