FNDC vs. VFSAX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FNDC (Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF) and VFSAX (Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap Index Fund Admiral Shares) are both Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FNDC returned 7.26%/yr vs 5.77%/yr for VFSAX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FNDC charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for VFSAX.

Performance

FNDC vs. VFSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap Index Fund Admiral Shares (VFSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDC achieves a 11.83% return, which is significantly higher than VFSAX's 10.71% return.

FNDC

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 11.83%
• 6M: 14.14%
• 1Y: 26.84%
• 3Y*: 18.52%
• 5Y*: 7.26%
• 10Y*: 8.64%

VFSAX

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: -0.05%
• YTD: 10.71%
• 6M: 13.39%
• 1Y: 26.48%
• 3Y*: 16.76%
• 5Y*: 5.77%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDC vs. VFSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FNDC Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF	11.83%	35.65%	1.38%	14.92%	-14.71%	10.26%	6.58%	12.82%
VFSAX Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap Index Fund Admiral Shares	10.71%	29.89%	2.58%	15.13%	-21.30%	12.68%	11.90%	13.47%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDC and VFSAX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2019	0.94

The correlation between FNDC and VFSAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDC vs. VFSAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNDC	VFSAX
Industrials	25.8%	18.7%
Consumer Cyclical	12.8%	9.3%
Financial Services	11.5%	10.8%
Basic Materials	11.0%	12.1%
Technology	8.7%	13.3%
Real Estate	6.9%	7.3%
Consumer Defensive	6.3%	3.4%
Healthcare	4.9%	6.2%
Communication Services	4.8%	2.3%
Energy	4.6%	4.9%
Utilities	2.8%	2.5%

Return for Risk

FNDC vs. VFSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDC

FNDC Risk / Return Rank: 55
FNDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
FNDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FNDC Omega Ratio Rank: 56
FNDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
FNDC Martin Ratio Rank: 53

VFSAX

VFSAX Risk / Return Rank: 45
VFSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
VFSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
VFSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 48
VFSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
VFSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDC vs. VFSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap Index Fund Admiral Shares (VFSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNDC	VFSAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	2.05	-0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	2.81	-0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.38	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.41	2.39	+0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.02	9.20	-0.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNDC vs. VFSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDC Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the VFSAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDC and VFSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNDC	VFSAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.90	2.05	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46	0.39	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.55	-0.05

Drawdowns

FNDC vs. VFSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDC drawdown since its inception was -43.22%, which is greater than VFSAX's maximum drawdown of -39.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDC and VFSAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNDC	VFSAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.22%	-39.86%	-3.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.20%	-11.48%	+0.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.98%	-14.73%	+1.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.13%	-33.81%	+1.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.68%	-1.98%	+0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.45%	-9.25%	+0.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.98%	2.98%	0.00%

Volatility

FNDC vs. VFSAX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap Index Fund Admiral Shares (VFSAX) have volatilities of 4.55% and 4.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNDC	VFSAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.55%	4.42%	+0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.77%	11.21%	+0.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.24%	13.40%	+0.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.97%	15.04%	+0.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.80%	17.03%	-0.23%

FNDC vs. VFSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VFSAX's 0.16% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNDC vs. VFSAX - Dividend Comparison

FNDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, more than VFSAX's 2.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDC Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF	3.45%	3.86%	3.59%	2.86%	1.98%	2.58%	1.77%	2.71%	2.68%	1.94%	1.95%	1.30%
VFSAX Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap Index Fund Admiral Shares	2.99%	3.31%	3.36%	3.06%	2.22%	2.67%	1.85%	3.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNDC and VFSAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, FNDC and VFSAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FNDC or VFSAX?

FNDC has higher volatility (4.55%) compared to VFSAX (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDC dropped -43.22% vs VFSAX's -39.86%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VFSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.