FNDC vs. DXIV
FNDC (Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF) and DXIV (Dimensional International Vector Equity ETF) are both Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities funds. FNDC is passively managed, while DXIV is actively managed. Over the past year, FNDC returned 27.62% vs 29.75% for DXIV. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FNDC charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for DXIV.
Performance
FNDC vs. DXIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FNDC having a 11.36% return and DXIV slightly lower at 10.82%.
FNDC
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- YTD
- 11.36%
- 6M
- 13.51%
- 1Y
- 27.62%
- 3Y*
- 18.14%
- 5Y*
- 7.17%
- 10Y*
- 8.66%
DXIV
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 2.94%
- YTD
- 10.82%
- 6M
- 14.26%
- 1Y
- 29.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNDC vs. DXIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FNDC Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF | 11.36% | 35.65% | -5.01% |
DXIV Dimensional International Vector Equity ETF | 10.82% | 39.12% | -4.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDC and DXIV is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2024 | 0.93 |
The correlation between FNDC and DXIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
FNDC vs. DXIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FNDC
DXIV
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Technology
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Industrials
FNDC
DXIV
Consumer Cyclical
FNDC
DXIV
Financial Services
FNDC
DXIV
Basic Materials
FNDC
DXIV
Technology
FNDC
DXIV
Real Estate
FNDC
DXIV
Consumer Defensive
FNDC
DXIV
Healthcare
FNDC
DXIV
Communication Services
FNDC
DXIV
Energy
FNDC
DXIV
Utilities
FNDC
DXIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNDC vs. DXIV — Risk / Return Rank
FNDC
DXIV
FNDC vs. DXIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) and Dimensional International Vector Equity ETF (DXIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNDC | DXIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.40 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 2.76 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.29 | 10.91 | -1.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNDC | DXIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 2.22 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 1.66 | -1.16 |
Drawdowns
FNDC vs. DXIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDC drawdown since its inception was -43.22%, which is greater than DXIV's maximum drawdown of -13.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDC and DXIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDC | DXIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.22% | -13.71% | -29.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.20% | -10.84% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.09% | -1.35% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.45% | -2.47% | -5.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 2.73% | +0.25% |
Volatility
FNDC vs. DXIV - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) has a higher volatility of 4.67% compared to Dimensional International Vector Equity ETF (DXIV) at 3.89%. This indicates that FNDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNDC | DXIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.67% | 3.89% | +0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.77% | 11.08% | +0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.26% | 13.50% | +0.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.98% | 15.39% | +0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.80% | 15.39% | +1.41% |
FNDC vs. DXIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than DXIV's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNDC vs. DXIV - Dividend Comparison
FNDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, more than DXIV's 2.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXIV Dimensional International Vector Equity ETF | 2.29% | 2.50% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDC Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF | 3.46% | 3.86% | 3.59% | 2.86% | 1.98% | 2.58% | 1.77% | 2.71% | 2.68% | 1.94% | 1.95% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, FNDC and DXIV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FNDC has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to DXIV (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDC dropped -43.22% vs DXIV's -13.71%.
On 1-year performance, DXIV leads with 29.75% vs 27.62% for FNDC. On fees, DXIV is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, DXIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DXIV has performed better with a 29.75% return vs 27.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DXIV is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FNDC.
FNDC has the higher dividend yield at 3.46%, compared with 2.29% for DXIV.
They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Dimensional Fund Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FNDC and 0.30% for DXIV.
DXIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNDC and DXIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer