FNDC vs. DXIV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FNDC (Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF) and DXIV (Dimensional International Vector Equity ETF) are both Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities funds. FNDC is passively managed, while DXIV is actively managed. Over the past year, FNDC returned 22.78% vs 25.98% for DXIV. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FNDC charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for DXIV.

Performance

FNDC vs. DXIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) and Dimensional International Vector Equity ETF (DXIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDC achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly higher than DXIV's 7.60% return.

FNDC

• 1D: -2.22%
• 1M: -2.87%
• YTD: 8.64%
• 6M: 8.23%
• 1Y: 22.78%
• 3Y*: 17.82%
• 5Y*: 7.13%
• 10Y*: 9.07%

DXIV

• 1D: -2.70%
• 1M: -2.87%
• YTD: 7.60%
• 6M: 7.42%
• 1Y: 25.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDC vs. DXIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FNDC Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF	8.64%	35.65%	-4.28%
DXIV Dimensional International Vector Equity ETF	7.60%	39.12%	-3.78%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDC and DXIV is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2024	0.93

The correlation between FNDC and DXIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDC vs. DXIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNDC	DXIV
Industrials	25.3%	19.1%
Consumer Cyclical	12.9%	11.6%
Financial Services	11.4%	17.4%
Basic Materials	11.3%	13.1%
Technology	10.1%	8.1%
Real Estate	6.6%	1.4%
Consumer Defensive	6.1%	6.1%
Healthcare	4.8%	6.4%
Communication Services	4.7%	5.5%
Energy	4.1%	8.8%
Utilities	2.6%	2.4%

Return for Risk

FNDC vs. DXIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDC

FNDC Risk / Return Rank: 45
FNDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
FNDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
FNDC Omega Ratio Rank: 46
FNDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
FNDC Martin Ratio Rank: 47

DXIV

DXIV Risk / Return Rank: 57
DXIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
DXIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
DXIV Omega Ratio Rank: 58
DXIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
DXIV Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDC vs. DXIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) and Dimensional International Vector Equity ETF (DXIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNDC	DXIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	1.85	-0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	2.53	-0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.34	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.04	2.41	-0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.47	9.38	-1.91

FNDC vs. DXIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDC Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the DXIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDC and DXIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNDC vs. DXIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDC drawdown since its inception was -43.22%, which is greater than DXIV's maximum drawdown of -13.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDC and DXIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNDC	DXIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.22%	-13.71%	-29.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.20%	-10.84%	-0.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.98%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.48%	-4.22%	-0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.42%	-2.45%	-5.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.06%	2.78%	+0.28%

Volatility

FNDC vs. DXIV - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) has a higher volatility of 5.54% compared to Dimensional International Vector Equity ETF (DXIV) at 4.98%. This indicates that FNDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNDC	DXIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.54%	4.98%	+0.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.73%	11.93%	+0.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.96%	14.12%	+0.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.09%	15.56%	+0.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.69%	15.56%	+1.13%

FNDC vs. DXIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than DXIV's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNDC vs. DXIV - Dividend Comparison

FNDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than DXIV's 2.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DXIV Dimensional International Vector Equity ETF	1.27%	2.50%	0.64%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FNDC Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF	3.55%	3.86%	3.59%	2.86%	1.98%	2.58%	1.77%	2.71%	2.68%	1.94%	1.95%	1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNDC and DXIV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, FNDC and DXIV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FNDC or DXIV?

FNDC has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to DXIV (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDC dropped -43.22% vs DXIV's -13.71%.

Which ETF is better, FNDC or DXIV?

On 1-year performance, DXIV leads with 25.98% vs 22.78% for FNDC. On fees, DXIV is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, DXIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNDC or DXIV?

Over the 1-year period, DXIV has performed better with a 25.98% return vs 22.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNDC or DXIV?

DXIV is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FNDC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNDC or DXIV?

FNDC has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 2.36% for DXIV.

What is the main difference between FNDC and DXIV?

They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Dimensional Fund Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FNDC and 0.30% for DXIV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DXIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.