FNDC vs. DISV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FNDC (Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF) and DISV (Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF) are both Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities funds. FNDC is passively managed, while DISV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FNDC returned 17.82%/yr vs 23.41%/yr for DISV. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FNDC charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for DISV.

Performance

FNDC vs. DISV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) and Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDC achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly higher than DISV's 6.66% return.

FNDC

• 1D: -2.22%
• 1M: -2.87%
• YTD: 8.64%
• 6M: 8.23%
• 1Y: 22.78%
• 3Y*: 17.82%
• 5Y*: 7.13%
• 10Y*: 9.07%

DISV

• 1D: -2.93%
• 1M: -3.68%
• YTD: 6.66%
• 6M: 6.73%
• 1Y: 28.97%
• 3Y*: 23.41%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDC vs. DISV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FNDC Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF	8.64%	35.65%	1.38%	14.92%	-9.89%
DISV Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF	6.66%	47.42%	5.87%	19.52%	-9.36%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDC and DISV is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2022	0.95

The correlation between FNDC and DISV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDC vs. DISV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNDC	DISV
Industrials	25.3%	17.8%
Consumer Cyclical	12.9%	15.4%
Financial Services	11.4%	19.5%
Basic Materials	11.3%	19.9%
Technology	10.1%	3.9%
Real Estate	6.6%	3.2%
Consumer Defensive	6.1%	3.6%
Healthcare	4.8%	3.6%
Communication Services	4.7%	2.4%
Energy	4.1%	7.1%
Utilities	2.6%	1.9%

Return for Risk

FNDC vs. DISV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDC

FNDC Risk / Return Rank: 45
FNDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
FNDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
FNDC Omega Ratio Rank: 46
FNDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
FNDC Martin Ratio Rank: 47

DISV

DISV Risk / Return Rank: 55
DISV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
DISV Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
DISV Omega Ratio Rank: 58
DISV Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
DISV Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDC vs. DISV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) and Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNDC	DISV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	1.92	-0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	2.62	-0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.34	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.04	2.29	-0.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.47	8.44	-0.97

FNDC vs. DISV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDC Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the DISV Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDC and DISV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNDC vs. DISV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDC drawdown since its inception was -43.22%, which is greater than DISV's maximum drawdown of -26.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDC and DISV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNDC	DISV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.22%	-26.77%	-16.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.20%	-12.69%	+1.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.98%	-14.15%	+1.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.48%	-6.16%	+1.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.42%	-4.88%	-3.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.06%	3.44%	-0.38%

Volatility

FNDC vs. DISV - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) and Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV) have volatilities of 5.54% and 5.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNDC	DISV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.54%	5.57%	-0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.73%	12.69%	+0.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.96%	15.19%	-0.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.09%	17.43%	-1.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.69%	17.43%	-0.74%

FNDC vs. DISV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than DISV's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNDC vs. DISV - Dividend Comparison

FNDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than DISV's 2.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DISV Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF	1.06%	2.69%	2.77%	2.73%	1.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FNDC Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF	3.55%	3.86%	3.59%	2.86%	1.98%	2.58%	1.77%	2.71%	2.68%	1.94%	1.95%	1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNDC and DISV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, FNDC and DISV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FNDC or DISV?

DISV has higher volatility (5.57%) compared to FNDC (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDC dropped -43.22% vs DISV's -26.77%.

Which ETF is better, FNDC or DISV?

On 3-year performance, DISV leads with 23.41% vs 17.82% for FNDC. On fees, FNDC is cheaper at 0.39% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNDC or DISV?

Over the 3-year period, DISV has performed better with a 23.41% return vs 17.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNDC or DISV?

FNDC is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for DISV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNDC or DISV?

FNDC has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 2.48% for DISV.

What is the main difference between FNDC and DISV?

They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FNDC and 0.42% for DISV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DISV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.