FNDC vs. CGV
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) and Conductor Global Equity Value ETF (CGV).
FNDC and CGV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FNDC is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell RAFI Small Company Developed x US. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. CGV is an actively managed fund by Conductor Fund. It was launched on Apr 19, 2016.
Performance
FNDC vs. CGV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FNDC vs. CGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDC Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF | 5.54% | 35.65% | 1.38% | 14.92% | -1.28% |
CGV Conductor Global Equity Value ETF | 7.76% | 23.11% | -3.34% | 5.72% | 3.44% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDC achieves a 5.54% return, which is significantly lower than CGV's 7.76% return.
FNDC
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- -5.37%
- YTD
- 5.54%
- 6M
- 9.06%
- 1Y
- 34.69%
- 3Y*
- 16.32%
- 5Y*
- 7.55%
- 10Y*
- 8.69%
CGV
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -5.76%
- YTD
- 7.76%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 32.10%
- 3Y*
- 10.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNDC vs. CGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than CGV's 1.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FNDC vs. CGV — Risk / Return Rank
FNDC
CGV
FNDC vs. CGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) and Conductor Global Equity Value ETF (CGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNDC | CGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.19 | 1.98 | +0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.99 | 2.64 | +0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.40 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 2.69 | +0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.02 | 10.25 | +1.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNDC | CGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 1.98 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.72 | -0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDC and CGV is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FNDC vs. CGV - Dividend Comparison
FNDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, less than CGV's 5.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDC Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF | 3.66% | 3.86% | 3.59% | 2.86% | 1.98% | 2.58% | 1.77% | 2.71% | 2.68% | 1.94% | 1.95% | 1.30% |
CGV Conductor Global Equity Value ETF | 5.09% | 4.58% | 2.87% | 4.56% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FNDC vs. CGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDC drawdown since its inception was -43.22%, which is greater than CGV's maximum drawdown of -16.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDC and CGV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDC | CGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.22% | -16.64% | -26.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.20% | -12.13% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.95% | -6.83% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.53% | -3.67% | -4.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 3.18% | -0.27% |
Volatility
FNDC vs. CGV - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) has a higher volatility of 6.60% compared to Conductor Global Equity Value ETF (CGV) at 6.10%. This indicates that FNDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FNDC | CGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.60% | 6.10% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.39% | 10.96% | -0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.88% | 16.27% | -0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.83% | 13.41% | +2.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 13.41% | +3.31% |