PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDB vs. SCHO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDB vs. SCHO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDB achieves a 15.31% return, which is significantly higher than SCHO's 0.50% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDB has outperformed SCHO with an annualized return of 14.02%, while SCHO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.72% annualized return.


FNDB

1D
0.74%
1M
3.35%
YTD
15.31%
6M
15.58%
1Y
33.57%
3Y*
21.00%
5Y*
12.55%
10Y*
14.02%

SCHO

1D
0.08%
1M
0.10%
YTD
0.50%
6M
0.90%
1Y
3.35%
3Y*
4.16%
5Y*
1.82%
10Y*
1.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDB vs. SCHO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNDB
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF
15.31%16.23%16.25%18.42%-7.53%31.55%9.40%28.88%-8.20%16.94%
SCHO
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
0.50%5.49%3.65%4.31%-3.87%-0.64%3.11%3.47%1.37%0.33%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDB and SCHO is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013

-0.13

The correlation between FNDB and SCHO shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDB vs. SCHO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDB
FNDB Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FNDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDB Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDB Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHO
SCHO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SCHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDB vs. SCHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNDBSCHODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.49

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.36

3.91

+1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.60

16.82

+3.78

FNDB vs. SCHO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDB Sharpe Ratio is 3.15, which is comparable to the SCHO Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDB and SCHO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNDBSCHODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.15

2.46

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.92

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

1.11

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

1.00

-0.21

Drawdowns

FNDB vs. SCHO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDB drawdown since its inception was -38.17%, which is greater than SCHO's maximum drawdown of -5.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDB and SCHO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDBSCHODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.17%

-5.69%

-32.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.29%

-0.86%

-5.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.83%

-0.98%

-15.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.29%

-5.69%

-13.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.17%

-5.69%

-32.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.18%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.66%

-0.61%

-3.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

0.20%

+1.43%

Volatility

FNDB vs. SCHO - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) has a higher volatility of 2.28% compared to Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) at 0.42%. This indicates that FNDB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDBSCHODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.28%

0.42%

+1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.63%

0.91%

+6.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.73%

1.37%

+9.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.36%

1.98%

+13.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.48%

1.56%

+15.92%

FNDB vs. SCHO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FNDB vs. SCHO - Dividend Comparison

FNDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than SCHO's 3.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDB
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF
1.43%1.62%1.74%1.80%1.98%1.63%2.15%2.23%2.41%1.91%2.06%2.26%
SCHO
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
3.90%4.06%4.29%3.76%1.34%0.41%1.27%2.27%1.60%1.12%0.82%0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNDB and SCHO have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNDB has higher volatility (2.28%) compared to SCHO (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDB dropped -38.17% vs SCHO's -5.69%.

On 10-year performance, FNDB leads with 14.02% vs 1.72% for SCHO. On fees, SCHO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHO has been the lower-risk option at 0.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNDB has performed better with a 14.02% return vs 1.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDB.

SCHO has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 1.43% for FNDB.

FNDB is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCHO is Government Bonds. FNDB tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index, while SCHO tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDB and 0.03% for SCHO.

FNDB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDB and SCHO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer