FNDB vs. FDVV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FNDB (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF) and FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FNDB is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index, while FDVV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Core Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FNDB returned 12.79%/yr vs 13.69%/yr for FDVV. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FNDB charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FDVV.

Performance

FNDB vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDB achieves a 14.40% return, which is significantly higher than FDVV's 8.39% return.

FNDB

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 0.73%
• YTD: 14.40%
• 6M: 13.78%
• 1Y: 30.50%
• 3Y*: 20.08%
• 5Y*: 12.79%
• 10Y*: 14.26%

FDVV

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.43%
• YTD: 8.39%
• 6M: 8.10%
• 1Y: 22.16%
• 3Y*: 19.90%
• 5Y*: 13.69%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDB vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF	14.40%	16.23%	16.25%	18.42%	-7.53%	31.55%	9.40%	28.88%	-8.20%	16.94%
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	8.39%	17.08%	21.81%	18.00%	-4.21%	29.24%	2.80%	24.07%	-1.26%	14.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDB and FDVV is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016	0.93

The correlation between FNDB and FDVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDB vs. FDVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNDB	FDVV
Technology	20.8%	30.5%
Financial Services	12.7%	17.0%
Healthcare	11.9%	3.0%
Industrials	10.0%	3.0%
Energy	9.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.2%	13.6%
Communication Services	8.9%	3.6%
Consumer Defensive	6.9%	10.7%
Basic Materials	3.7%	-
Utilities	3.0%	8.6%
Real Estate	2.2%	9.9%

Return for Risk

FNDB vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDB

FNDB Risk / Return Rank: 88
FNDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FNDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
FNDB Omega Ratio Rank: 87
FNDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FNDB Martin Ratio Rank: 88

FDVV

FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 64
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 71
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDB vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNDB	FDVV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.80	2.19	+0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.89	3.06	+0.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.40	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.87	2.39	+2.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.52	9.89	+8.62

FNDB vs. FDVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDB Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is comparable to the FDVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDB and FDVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNDB vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDB drawdown since its inception was -38.17%, smaller than the maximum FDVV drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDB and FDVV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNDB	FDVV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.17%	-40.25%	+2.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.29%	-9.30%	+3.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.83%	-15.90%	-0.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.29%	-20.18%	+0.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.46%	-1.31%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.65%	-3.79%	+0.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.65%	2.24%	-0.59%

Volatility

FNDB vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) at 3.09%. This indicates that FNDB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNDB	FDVV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.38%	3.09%	+0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.98%	8.26%	-0.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.96%	10.15%	+0.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.35%	14.73%	+0.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.46%	16.97%	+0.49%

FNDB vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNDB vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison

FNDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than FDVV's 2.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	2.86%	2.89%	2.94%	3.77%	3.44%	2.70%	3.19%	3.93%	4.05%	3.66%	1.04%	0.00%
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF	1.44%	1.62%	1.74%	1.80%	1.98%	1.63%	2.15%	2.23%	2.41%	1.91%	2.06%	2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNDB and FDVV in my portfolio?

FNDB and FDVV have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNDB or FDVV?

FNDB has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to FDVV (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDB dropped -38.17% vs FDVV's -40.25%.

Which ETF is better, FNDB or FDVV?

On 5-year performance, FDVV leads with 13.69% vs 12.79% for FNDB. On fees, FNDB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FDVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNDB or FDVV?

Over the 5-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 13.69% return vs 12.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNDB or FDVV?

FNDB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FDVV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNDB or FDVV?

FDVV has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 1.44% for FNDB.

What is the main difference between FNDB and FDVV?

FNDB is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while FDVV is Large Cap Blend Equities. FNDB tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index, while FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDB and 0.29% for FDVV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.