PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDB vs. DTD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDB vs. DTD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) and WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund (DTD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDB achieves a 14.40% return, which is significantly higher than DTD's 10.39% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDB has outperformed DTD with an annualized return of 14.26%, while DTD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.37% annualized return.


FNDB

1D
-0.46%
1M
0.73%
YTD
14.40%
6M
13.78%
1Y
30.50%
3Y*
20.08%
5Y*
12.79%
10Y*
14.26%

DTD

1D
0.00%
1M
0.37%
YTD
10.39%
6M
9.68%
1Y
21.29%
3Y*
17.90%
5Y*
12.14%
10Y*
12.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDB vs. DTD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNDB
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF
14.40%16.23%16.25%18.42%-7.53%31.55%9.40%28.88%-8.20%16.94%
DTD
WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund
10.39%14.25%18.56%10.63%-3.83%26.26%2.45%28.19%-6.47%17.35%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDB and DTD is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013

0.95

The correlation between FNDB and DTD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDB vs. DTD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNDB
DTD

Technology

20.8%
20.9%

Financial Services

12.7%
18.2%

Healthcare

11.9%
11.5%

Industrials

10.0%
8.4%

Energy

9.3%
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
5.5%

Communication Services

8.9%
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

6.9%
8.4%

Basic Materials

3.7%
1.5%

Utilities

3.0%
5.5%

Real Estate

2.2%
5.1%

Technology

FNDB
20.8%
DTD
20.9%

Financial Services

FNDB
12.7%
DTD
18.2%

Healthcare

FNDB
11.9%
DTD
11.5%

Industrials

FNDB
10.0%
DTD
8.4%

Energy

FNDB
9.3%
DTD
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FNDB
9.2%
DTD
5.5%

Communication Services

FNDB
8.9%
DTD
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

FNDB
6.9%
DTD
8.4%

Basic Materials

FNDB
3.7%
DTD
1.5%

Utilities

FNDB
3.0%
DTD
5.5%

Real Estate

FNDB
2.2%
DTD
5.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDB vs. DTD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDB
FNDB Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FNDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDB Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDB Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

DTD
DTD Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTD Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
DTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTD Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDB vs. DTD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) and WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund (DTD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNDBDTDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.41

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.87

3.39

+1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.52

14.00

+4.52

FNDB vs. DTD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDB Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is comparable to the DTD Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDB and DTD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNDB vs. DTD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDB drawdown since its inception was -38.17%, smaller than the maximum DTD drawdown of -58.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDB and DTD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDBDTDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.17%

-58.19%

+20.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.29%

-6.30%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.83%

-14.41%

-2.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.29%

-16.14%

-3.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.17%

-37.29%

-0.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

-0.92%

-0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.65%

-7.32%

+3.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

1.52%

+0.13%

Volatility

FNDB vs. DTD - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund (DTD) at 2.65%. This indicates that FNDB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DTD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDBDTDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.38%

2.65%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.98%

7.13%

+0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.96%

9.41%

+1.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.35%

13.56%

+1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.46%

16.19%

+1.27%

FNDB vs. DTD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DTD's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNDB vs. DTD - Dividend Comparison

FNDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than DTD's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DTD
WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund
1.86%1.99%2.07%2.43%2.62%2.04%2.73%2.50%2.93%2.36%2.66%2.81%
FNDB
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF
1.44%1.62%1.74%1.80%1.98%1.63%2.15%2.23%2.41%1.91%2.06%2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FNDB and DTD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FNDB has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to DTD (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDB dropped -38.17% vs DTD's -58.19%.

On 10-year performance, FNDB leads with 14.26% vs 12.37% for DTD. On fees, FNDB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DTD has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNDB has performed better with a 14.26% return vs 12.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNDB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DTD.

DTD has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 1.44% for FNDB.

FNDB tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index, while DTD tracks WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDB and 0.28% for DTD.

FNDB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDB and DTD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer