FNDA vs. SPAXX
FNDA (Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF) and SPAXX (Fidelity Government Money Market Fund) are both funds - FNDA is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell RAFI Small Company US, while SPAXX is a Money Market fund actively managed by Fidelity. FNDA is passively managed, while SPAXX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FNDA returned 6.73%/yr vs 1.45%/yr for SPAXX. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. FNDA charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for SPAXX.
Performance
FNDA vs. SPAXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDA achieves a 14.40% return, which is significantly higher than SPAXX's 1.37% return.
FNDA
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- 14.40%
- 6M
- 14.29%
- 1Y
- 29.17%
- 3Y*
- 14.87%
- 5Y*
- 6.73%
- 10Y*
- 10.81%
SPAXX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.37%
- 6M
- 1.67%
- 1Y
- 3.66%
- 3Y*
- 2.42%
- 5Y*
- 1.45%
- 10Y*
- —
FNDA vs. SPAXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF | 14.40% | 7.44% | 9.00% | 20.29% | -14.83% | 6.87% |
SPAXX Fidelity Government Money Market Fund | 1.37% | 3.96% | 1.54% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDA and SPAXX is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNDA vs. SPAXX — Risk / Return Rank
FNDA
SPAXX
FNDA vs. SPAXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and Fidelity Government Money Market Fund (SPAXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNDA | SPAXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.09 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNDA | SPAXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 3.65 | -1.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 2.13 | -1.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 2.12 | -1.64 |
Drawdowns
FNDA vs. SPAXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDA drawdown since its inception was -44.64%, which is greater than SPAXX's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDA and SPAXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDA | SPAXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.64% | 0.00% | -44.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | 0.00% | -9.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.92% | 0.00% | -25.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.92% | 0.00% | -25.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.42% | 0.00% | -1.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.69% | 0.00% | -6.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 0.00% | +2.90% |
Volatility
FNDA vs. SPAXX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to Fidelity Government Money Market Fund (SPAXX) at 0.28%. This indicates that FNDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPAXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNDA | SPAXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.61% | 0.28% | +4.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.98% | 0.72% | +11.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.24% | 1.03% | +16.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.91% | 0.69% | +20.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.39% | 0.69% | +21.70% |
FNDA vs. SPAXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SPAXX's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNDA vs. SPAXX - Dividend Comparison
FNDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than SPAXX's 3.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.53% | 1.37% | 1.38% | 1.15% | 1.31% | 1.38% | 1.64% | 1.30% | 1.18% | 1.33% |
SPAXX Fidelity Government Money Market Fund | 3.59% | 3.88% | 1.53% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNDA and SPAXX have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNDA has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to SPAXX (0.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDA dropped -44.64% vs SPAXX's 0.00%.
SPAXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNDA and SPAXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer