PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDA vs. FESM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FNDA vs. FESM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FNDA vs. FESM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF
3.11%7.44%9.00%11.79%
FESM
Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF
0.82%17.88%16.22%12.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDA achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly higher than FESM's 0.82% return.


FNDA

1D
2.59%
1M
-5.58%
YTD
3.11%
6M
4.77%
1Y
19.91%
3Y*
11.61%
5Y*
6.25%
10Y*
10.01%

FESM

1D
3.29%
1M
-4.77%
YTD
0.82%
6M
4.42%
1Y
29.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FNDA vs. FESM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FESM's 0.28% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FNDA vs. FESM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDA
FNDA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FNDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDA Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDA Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

FESM
FESM Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FESM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FESM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FESM Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FESM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FESM Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDA vs. FESM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNDAFESMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.91

1.30

-0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.41

1.87

-0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.24

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

2.19

-0.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.33

8.40

-3.06

FNDA vs. FESM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDA Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the FESM Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDA and FESM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNDAFESMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

1.30

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.96

-0.51

Correlation

The correlation between FNDA and FESM is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FNDA vs. FESM - Dividend Comparison

FNDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than FESM's 0.63% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF
1.21%1.22%1.53%1.37%1.38%1.15%1.31%1.38%1.64%1.30%1.18%1.33%
FESM
Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF
0.63%0.82%1.08%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FNDA vs. FESM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDA drawdown since its inception was -44.64%, which is greater than FESM's maximum drawdown of -26.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDA and FESM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDAFESMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.64%

-26.93%

-17.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.42%

-13.54%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.96%

-7.23%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.76%

-5.04%

-1.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.77%

3.53%

+0.24%

Volatility

FNDA vs. FESM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) is 6.37%, while Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM) has a volatility of 7.40%. This indicates that FNDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FESM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FNDAFESMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.37%

7.40%

-1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.74%

14.26%

-1.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.04%

22.98%

-0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.01%

21.49%

-0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.36%

21.49%

+0.87%