PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDA vs. BSMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FNDA vs. BSMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Index Fund (BSMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FNDA vs. BSMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF
3.11%7.44%9.00%20.29%-14.83%31.12%8.44%24.34%-12.12%12.68%
BSMIX
iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Index Fund
-1.37%11.92%12.04%17.15%-18.39%18.00%20.28%27.62%-10.22%16.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDA achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly higher than BSMIX's -1.37% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FNDA having a 10.01% annualized return and BSMIX not far ahead at 10.11%.


FNDA

1D
2.59%
1M
-5.58%
YTD
3.11%
6M
4.77%
1Y
19.91%
3Y*
11.61%
5Y*
6.25%
10Y*
10.01%

BSMIX

1D
-1.26%
1M
-8.33%
YTD
-1.37%
6M
0.85%
1Y
19.40%
3Y*
11.90%
5Y*
4.70%
10Y*
10.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FNDA vs. BSMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMIX's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

FNDA vs. BSMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDA
FNDA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FNDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDA Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDA Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

BSMIX
BSMIX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
BSMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
BSMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDA vs. BSMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Index Fund (BSMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNDABSMIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.91

0.88

+0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.41

1.36

+0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.18

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

1.19

+0.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.33

5.17

+0.16

FNDA vs. BSMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDA Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is comparable to the BSMIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDA and BSMIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNDABSMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

0.88

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.22

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.47

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.47

-0.02

Correlation

The correlation between FNDA and BSMIX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FNDA vs. BSMIX - Dividend Comparison

FNDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than BSMIX's 2.94% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF
1.21%1.22%1.53%1.37%1.38%1.15%1.31%1.38%1.64%1.30%1.18%1.33%
BSMIX
iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Index Fund
2.94%2.90%2.04%1.37%4.94%4.77%4.42%2.83%4.33%2.83%1.45%0.00%

Drawdowns

FNDA vs. BSMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDA drawdown since its inception was -44.64%, which is greater than BSMIX's maximum drawdown of -41.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDA and BSMIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDABSMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.64%

-41.32%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.42%

-14.24%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.92%

-28.33%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.64%

-41.32%

-3.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.96%

-9.39%

+2.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.76%

-7.52%

+0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.77%

3.29%

+0.48%

Volatility

FNDA vs. BSMIX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Index Fund (BSMIX) have volatilities of 6.37% and 6.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FNDABSMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.37%

6.35%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.74%

12.71%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.04%

21.93%

+0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.01%

21.10%

-0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.36%

21.63%

+0.73%