FNCMX vs. FOKFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FNCMX (Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund) and FOKFX (Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FNCMX returned 15.70%/yr vs 18.58%/yr for FOKFX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FNCMX charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FOKFX.

Performance

FNCMX vs. FOKFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) and Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio (FOKFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNCMX achieves a 16.82% return, which is significantly lower than FOKFX's 28.00% return.

FNCMX

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 8.17%
• YTD: 16.82%
• 6M: 15.82%
• 1Y: 40.51%
• 3Y*: 27.91%
• 5Y*: 15.70%
• 10Y*: 19.45%

FOKFX

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: 11.67%
• YTD: 28.00%
• 6M: 26.89%
• 1Y: 59.16%
• 3Y*: 32.88%
• 5Y*: 18.58%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNCMX vs. FOKFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund	16.82%	21.11%	29.48%	45.13%	-32.40%	22.21%	44.57%	15.02%
FOKFX Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio	28.00%	20.30%	34.58%	43.48%	-32.32%	25.95%	47.52%	17.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FNCMX and FOKFX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2019	0.98

The correlation between FNCMX and FOKFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FNCMX vs. FOKFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNCMX

FNCMX Risk / Return Rank: 68
FNCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
FNCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FNCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FNCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FNCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

FOKFX

FOKFX Risk / Return Rank: 89
FOKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
FOKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FOKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FOKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FOKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNCMX vs. FOKFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) and Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio (FOKFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNCMX	FOKFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.58	3.27	-0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.36	4.07	-0.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.54	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.22	4.82	-1.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.65	19.97	-7.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNCMX vs. FOKFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNCMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the FOKFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNCMX and FOKFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNCMX	FOKFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.58	3.27	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70	0.81	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.96	-0.38

Drawdowns

FNCMX vs. FOKFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNCMX drawdown since its inception was -55.08%, which is greater than FOKFX's maximum drawdown of -37.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNCMX and FOKFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNCMX	FOKFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.08%	-37.26%	-17.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.01%	-12.53%	-0.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.20%	-24.81%	+0.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.64%	-37.26%	+1.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.64%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.86%	-9.20%	+1.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.30%	3.01%	+0.29%

Volatility

FNCMX vs. FOKFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) is 4.12%, while Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio (FOKFX) has a volatility of 5.62%. This indicates that FNCMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOKFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNCMX	FOKFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.12%	5.62%	-1.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.10%	14.55%	-2.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.23%	18.45%	-2.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.46%	23.01%	-0.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.05%	24.63%	-2.58%

FNCMX vs. FOKFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNCMX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FOKFX's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNCMX vs. FOKFX - Dividend Comparison

FNCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than FOKFX's 3.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund	0.44%	0.51%	0.61%	0.67%	0.88%	0.47%	0.67%	4.41%	1.93%	0.03%	1.01%	1.50%
FOKFX Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio	3.28%	4.20%	4.58%	0.24%	0.08%	3.81%	0.39%	0.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNCMX and FOKFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, FNCMX and FOKFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FNCMX or FOKFX?

FOKFX has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to FNCMX (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNCMX dropped -55.08% vs FOKFX's -37.26%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FOKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.