FNCL vs. KBWP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FNCL (Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF) and KBWP (Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - FNCL tracks the MSCI USA IMI Financials Index while KBWP tracks the KBW Nasdaq Property & Casualty (TR). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FNCL returned 12.14%/yr vs 11.22%/yr for KBWP. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FNCL charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for KBWP.

Performance

FNCL vs. KBWP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) and Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNCL achieves a -6.43% return, which is significantly higher than KBWP's -8.80% return. Over the past 10 years, FNCL has outperformed KBWP with an annualized return of 12.14%, while KBWP has yielded a comparatively lower 11.22% annualized return.

FNCL

• 1D: -1.42%
• 1M: -1.74%
• YTD: -6.43%
• 6M: -3.99%
• 1Y: 2.36%
• 3Y*: 18.42%
• 5Y*: 7.79%
• 10Y*: 12.14%

KBWP

• 1D: -0.82%
• 1M: -2.90%
• YTD: -8.80%
• 6M: -4.88%
• 1Y: -7.04%
• 3Y*: 14.48%
• 5Y*: 9.97%
• 10Y*: 11.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNCL vs. KBWP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNCL Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF	-6.43%	14.94%	30.44%	14.10%	-12.28%	34.92%	-2.19%	31.59%	-13.44%	19.99%
KBWP Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF	-8.80%	11.49%	30.45%	7.09%	10.16%	20.61%	-2.05%	28.67%	-2.76%	8.86%

Correlation

The correlation between FNCL and KBWP is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013	0.70

The correlation between FNCL and KBWP shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.70 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FNCL vs. KBWP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNCL	KBWP
Financial Services	96.9%	100.0%
Technology	2.1%	-
Real Estate	0.7%	-
Industrials	0.2%	-
Healthcare	0.0%	-
Communication Services	0.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FNCL vs. KBWP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNCL

FNCL Risk / Return Rank: 10
FNCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
FNCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
FNCL Omega Ratio Rank: 10
FNCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
FNCL Martin Ratio Rank: 11

KBWP

KBWP Risk / Return Rank: 3
KBWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
KBWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
KBWP Omega Ratio Rank: 5
KBWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
KBWP Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNCL vs. KBWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) and Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNCL	KBWP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.16	-0.44	+0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.32	-0.49	+0.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	0.94	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.16	-0.74	+0.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.43	-1.56	+1.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNCL vs. KBWP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNCL Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is higher than the KBWP Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNCL and KBWP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNCL	KBWP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16	-0.44	+0.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	0.54	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	0.54	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.69	-0.16

Drawdowns

FNCL vs. KBWP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNCL drawdown since its inception was -44.38%, which is greater than KBWP's maximum drawdown of -39.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNCL and KBWP.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNCL	KBWP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.38%	-39.76%	-4.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.78%	-9.56%	-5.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.29%	-12.29%	-5.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.68%	-17.00%	-8.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.38%	-39.76%	-4.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.28%	-9.56%	+0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.90%	-4.37%	-2.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.56%	4.72%	+0.84%

Volatility

FNCL vs. KBWP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) is 3.26%, while Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) has a volatility of 4.16%. This indicates that FNCL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KBWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNCL	KBWP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.26%	4.16%	-0.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.03%	11.41%	-0.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.76%	16.20%	-1.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.26%	18.53%	+0.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.34%	20.70%	+1.64%

FNCL vs. KBWP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNCL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than KBWP's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNCL vs. KBWP - Dividend Comparison

FNCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than KBWP's 2.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNCL Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF	1.70%	1.45%	1.52%	1.91%	2.29%	1.75%	2.26%	2.17%	2.37%	1.60%	1.81%	2.17%
KBWP Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF	2.03%	1.58%	1.64%	1.68%	1.99%	3.02%	1.93%	1.99%	2.11%	1.90%	2.14%	1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNCL and KBWP in my portfolio?

FNCL and KBWP have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNCL or KBWP?

KBWP has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to FNCL (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNCL dropped -44.38% vs KBWP's -39.76%.

Which ETF is better, FNCL or KBWP?

On 10-year performance, FNCL leads with 12.14% vs 11.22% for KBWP. On fees, FNCL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FNCL has been the lower-risk option at 3.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNCL or KBWP?

Over the 10-year period, FNCL has performed better with a 12.14% return vs 11.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNCL or KBWP?

FNCL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for KBWP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNCL or KBWP?

KBWP has the higher dividend yield at 2.03%, compared with 1.70% for FNCL.

What is the main difference between FNCL and KBWP?

FNCL tracks MSCI USA IMI Financials Index, while KBWP tracks KBW Nasdaq Property & Casualty (TR). They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FNCL and 0.35% for KBWP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNCL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.16 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.