FN vs. WELL
FN (Fabrinet) and WELL (Welltower Inc.) are both stocks. FN operates in Electronic Components (Technology), while WELL operates in REIT - Healthcare Facilities (Real Estate). Over the past 10 years, FN returned 28.66%/yr vs 15.79%/yr for WELL. Their 0.17 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
FN vs. WELL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FN achieves a -4.36% return, which is significantly lower than WELL's 27.19% return. Over the past 10 years, FN has outperformed WELL with an annualized return of 28.66%, while WELL has yielded a comparatively lower 15.79% annualized return.
FN
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- -20.43%
- 6M
- -11.04%
- YTD
- -4.36%
- 1Y
- 34.50%
- 3Y*
- 52.15%
- 5Y*
- 35.73%
- 10Y*
- 28.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 25.71%
WELL
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 1.85%
- 6M
- 25.33%
- YTD
- 27.19%
- 1Y
- 44.21%
- 3Y*
- 43.40%
- 5Y*
- 25.01%
- 10Y*
- 15.79%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.00%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
FN Fabrinet | $369.31M | $374.33M | $584.37M |
WELL Welltower Inc. | $732.91M | $699.76M | $765.75M |
FN vs. WELL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FN Fabrinet | -4.36% | 107.06% | 15.53% | 48.44% | 8.23% | 52.69% | 19.66% | 26.37% | 78.78% | -28.78% |
WELL Welltower Inc. | 27.19% | 49.86% | 43.07% | 41.79% | -21.18% | 36.98% | -17.19% | 23.04% | 15.31% | 0.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between FN and WELL is 0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2010 | 0.17 |
The correlation between FN and WELL shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.18 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FN:
$15.60B
WELL:
$168.93B
FN:
$11.64
WELL:
$2.17
FN:
37.40
WELL:
107.87
FN:
1.60
WELL:
2.39
FN:
3.72
WELL:
13.21
FN:
6.84
WELL:
3.70
FN:
$4.24B
WELL:
$12.66B
FN:
$509.75M
WELL:
$2.25B
FN:
$422.55M
WELL:
$3.08B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FN vs. WELL — Risk / Return Rank
FN
WELL
FN vs. WELL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fabrinet (FN) and Welltower Inc. (WELL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FN | WELL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.33 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.78 | 3.52 | -2.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.36 | 8.52 | -6.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FN vs. WELL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FN drawdown since its inception was -70.46%, which is greater than WELL's maximum drawdown of -63.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FN and WELL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FN | WELL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.46% | -63.33% | -7.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.47% | -12.61% | -31.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.47% | -12.99% | -31.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.47% | -40.78% | -3.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.11% | -63.33% | +12.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.67% | -6.99% | -34.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.65% | -10.27% | -12.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.68% | 5.20% | +9.48% |
Volatility
FN vs. WELL - Volatility Comparison
Fabrinet (FN) has a higher volatility of 20.97% compared to Welltower Inc. (WELL) at 7.23%. This indicates that FN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WELL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FN | WELL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.97% | 7.23% | +13.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.26% | 18.35% | +39.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.07% | 22.30% | +48.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.89% | 23.79% | +31.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.81% | 31.99% | +16.82% |
Dividends
FN vs. WELL - Dividend Comparison
FN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WELL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FN Fabrinet | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WELL Welltower Inc. | 1.26% | 1.52% | 2.03% | 2.71% | 3.72% | 2.84% | 4.18% | 4.26% | 5.01% | 5.46% | 5.14% | 4.85% |
Financials
FN vs. WELL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fabrinet and Welltower Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FN vs. WELL - Profitability Comparison
FN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fabrinet reported a gross profit of 144.34M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.9%.
WELL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Welltower Inc. reported a gross profit of -1.25B and revenue of 3.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -34.8%.
FN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fabrinet reported an operating income of 120.04M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.
WELL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Welltower Inc. reported an operating income of 656.88M and revenue of 3.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.3%.
FN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fabrinet reported a net income of 128.18M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.
WELL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Welltower Inc. reported a net income of 445.00M and revenue of 3.59B, resulting in a net margin of 12.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FN and WELL have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FN has higher volatility (20.97%) compared to WELL (7.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FN dropped -70.46% vs WELL's -63.33%.
WELL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FN and WELL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer