FN vs. POWL
FN (Fabrinet) and POWL (Powell Industries, Inc.) are both stocks. FN operates in Electronic Components (Technology), while POWL operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, FN returned 32.67%/yr vs 40.56%/yr for POWL. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FN vs. POWL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FN achieves a 34.21% return, which is significantly lower than POWL's 177.61% return. Over the past 10 years, FN has underperformed POWL with an annualized return of 32.67%, while POWL has yielded a comparatively higher 40.56% annualized return.
FN
- 1D
- 4.94%
- 1M
- -15.38%
- YTD
- 34.21%
- 6M
- 29.76%
- 1Y
- 149.30%
- 3Y*
- 67.62%
- 5Y*
- 45.38%
- 10Y*
- 32.67%
POWL
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 177.61%
- 6M
- 162.55%
- 1Y
- 372.00%
- 3Y*
- 146.47%
- 5Y*
- 94.19%
- 10Y*
- 40.56%
FN vs. POWL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FN Fabrinet | 34.21% | 107.06% | 15.53% | 48.44% | 8.23% | 52.69% | 19.66% | 26.37% | 78.78% | -28.78% |
POWL Powell Industries, Inc. | 177.61% | 44.49% | 152.21% | 155.62% | 24.34% | 3.60% | -37.60% | 101.58% | -9.92% | -24.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FN and POWL is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2010 | 0.35 |
The correlation between FN and POWL shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.45 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FN:
$22.13B
POWL:
$10.77B
FN:
$11.65
POWL:
$5.12
FN:
52.46
POWL:
57.59
FN:
2.25
POWL:
0.09
FN:
5.21
POWL:
9.51
FN:
9.60
POWL:
15.19
FN:
$4.24B
POWL:
$1.13B
FN:
$509.75M
POWL:
$340.78M
FN:
$422.55M
POWL:
$236.11M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FN vs. POWL — Risk / Return Rank
FN
POWL
FN vs. POWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fabrinet (FN) and Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FN | POWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.60 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.22 | 11.71 | -5.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.46 | 36.97 | -21.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FN vs. POWL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FN drawdown since its inception was -70.46%, roughly equal to the maximum POWL drawdown of -73.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FN and POWL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FN | POWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.46% | -73.10% | +2.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.27% | -30.88% | +8.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.47% | -55.76% | +18.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.70% | -55.76% | +17.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.11% | -68.85% | +17.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.15% | -8.45% | -9.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.58% | -36.09% | +13.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.95% | 9.76% | -0.81% |
Volatility
FN vs. POWL - Volatility Comparison
Fabrinet (FN) has a higher volatility of 24.63% compared to Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) at 19.86%. This indicates that FN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POWL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FN | POWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.63% | 19.86% | +4.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.18% | 44.83% | +11.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.07% | 59.91% | +7.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.67% | 64.36% | -10.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.29% | 54.84% | -6.55% |
Dividends
FN vs. POWL - Dividend Comparison
FN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while POWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FN Fabrinet | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
POWL Powell Industries, Inc. | 0.12% | 0.34% | 0.48% | 1.19% | 2.96% | 3.53% | 3.53% | 2.12% | 4.16% | 3.63% | 2.67% | 4.00% |
Financials
FN vs. POWL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fabrinet and Powell Industries, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FN vs. POWL - Profitability Comparison
FN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported a gross profit of 144.34M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.9%.
POWL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Powell Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 87.94M and revenue of 296.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.7%.
FN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported an operating income of 120.04M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.
POWL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Powell Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 57.58M and revenue of 296.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.4%.
FN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported a net income of 128.18M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.
POWL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Powell Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 45.89M and revenue of 296.62M, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FN and POWL have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FN has higher volatility (24.63%) compared to POWL (19.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FN dropped -70.46% vs POWL's -73.10%.
POWL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.03 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FN and POWL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer