FN vs. GOOGL
FN (Fabrinet) and GOOGL (Alphabet Inc. Class A) are both stocks. FN operates in Electronic Components (Technology), while GOOGL operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, FN returned 28.66%/yr vs 24.55%/yr for GOOGL. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
FN vs. GOOGL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FN achieves a -4.36% return, which is significantly lower than GOOGL's 13.93% return. Over the past 10 years, FN has outperformed GOOGL with an annualized return of 28.66%, while GOOGL has yielded a comparatively lower 24.55% annualized return.
FN
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- -20.43%
- 6M
- -11.04%
- YTD
- -4.36%
- 1Y
- 34.50%
- 3Y*
- 52.15%
- 5Y*
- 35.73%
- 10Y*
- 28.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 25.71%
GOOGL
- 1D
- 6.73%
- 1M
- -1.41%
- 6M
- 5.50%
- YTD
- 13.93%
- 1Y
- 86.11%
- 3Y*
- 39.78%
- 5Y*
- 21.67%
- 10Y*
- 24.55%
- ALL TIME*
- 25.41%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
FN Fabrinet | $369.31M | $374.33M | $584.37M |
| $11.74B | $10.31B | $11.78B |
FN vs. GOOGL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FN Fabrinet | -4.36% | 107.06% | 15.53% | 48.44% | 8.23% | 52.69% | 19.66% | 26.37% | 78.78% | -28.78% |
GOOGL Alphabet Inc. Class A | 13.93% | 65.99% | 36.01% | 58.32% | -39.09% | 65.30% | 30.85% | 28.18% | -0.80% | 32.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between FN and GOOGL is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2010 | 0.32 |
The correlation between FN and GOOGL shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.36 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FN:
$15.60B
GOOGL:
$4.31T
FN:
$11.64
GOOGL:
$19.94
FN:
37.40
GOOGL:
17.86
FN:
1.60
GOOGL:
0.88
FN:
3.72
GOOGL:
9.78
FN:
6.84
GOOGL:
7.04
FN:
$4.24B
GOOGL:
$445.93B
FN:
$509.75M
GOOGL:
$271.59B
FN:
$422.55M
GOOGL:
$325.74B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FN vs. GOOGL — Risk / Return Rank
FN
GOOGL
FN vs. GOOGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fabrinet (FN) and Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FN | GOOGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.46 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.78 | 4.11 | -3.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.36 | 11.67 | -9.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FN vs. GOOGL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FN drawdown since its inception was -70.46%, which is greater than GOOGL's maximum drawdown of -65.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FN and GOOGL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FN | GOOGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.46% | -65.29% | -5.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.47% | -21.05% | -23.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.47% | -29.81% | -14.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.47% | -44.32% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.11% | -44.32% | -6.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.67% | -11.49% | -30.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.65% | -13.01% | -9.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.68% | 7.41% | +7.27% |
Volatility
FN vs. GOOGL - Volatility Comparison
Fabrinet (FN) has a higher volatility of 20.97% compared to Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL) at 13.03%. This indicates that FN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FN | GOOGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.97% | 13.03% | +7.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.26% | 24.79% | +33.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.07% | 32.12% | +38.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.89% | 31.92% | +22.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.81% | 29.43% | +19.38% |
Dividends
FN vs. GOOGL - Dividend Comparison
FN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GOOGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FN Fabrinet | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GOOGL Alphabet Inc. Class A | 0.24% | 0.27% | 0.32% |
Financials
FN vs. GOOGL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fabrinet and Alphabet Inc. Class A. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FN vs. GOOGL - Profitability Comparison
FN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fabrinet reported a gross profit of 144.34M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.9%.
GOOGL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported a gross profit of 73.85B and revenue of 119.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.7%.
FN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fabrinet reported an operating income of 120.04M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.
GOOGL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported an operating income of 40.77B and revenue of 119.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.0%.
FN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fabrinet reported a net income of 128.18M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.
GOOGL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported a net income of 112.19B and revenue of 119.80B, resulting in a net margin of 93.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FN and GOOGL have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FN has higher volatility (20.97%) compared to GOOGL (13.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FN dropped -70.46% vs GOOGL's -65.29%.
GOOGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FN and GOOGL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer