PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FN vs. DTCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FN vs. DTCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fabrinet (FN) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FN achieves a 24.80% return, which is significantly lower than DTCR's 47.11% return.


FN

1D
-2.64%
1M
-19.28%
YTD
24.80%
6M
17.94%
1Y
105.49%
3Y*
66.02%
5Y*
42.92%
10Y*
32.15%

DTCR

1D
-1.40%
1M
1.87%
YTD
47.11%
6M
48.06%
1Y
67.40%
3Y*
34.83%
5Y*
14.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FN vs. DTCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FN
Fabrinet
24.80%107.06%15.53%48.44%8.23%52.69%29.49%
DTCR
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF
47.11%28.99%14.92%18.93%-30.89%20.35%6.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FN and DTCR is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2020

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FN vs. DTCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FN
FN Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FN Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FN Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

DTCR
DTCR Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DTCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTCR Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
DTCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTCR Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FN vs. DTCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fabrinet (FN) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNDTCRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.47

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.44

5.25

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.03

16.15

-5.11

FN vs. DTCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FN Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the DTCR Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FN and DTCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FN vs. DTCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FN drawdown since its inception was -70.46%, which is greater than DTCR's maximum drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FN and DTCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDTCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.46%

-38.98%

-31.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.89%

-12.89%

-11.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.47%

-24.96%

-12.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.70%

-38.98%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.89%

-4.37%

-19.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.58%

-12.27%

-10.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.60%

4.19%

+5.41%

Volatility

FN vs. DTCR - Volatility Comparison

Fabrinet (FN) has a higher volatility of 25.38% compared to Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) at 9.83%. This indicates that FN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DTCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDTCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.38%

9.83%

+15.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.51%

18.53%

+36.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.76%

23.31%

+44.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.00%

22.16%

+31.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.44%

22.10%

+26.34%

Dividends

FN vs. DTCR - Dividend Comparison

FN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DTCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DTCR
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF
0.75%1.10%1.72%1.18%2.57%1.27%0.30%
FN
Fabrinet
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FN and DTCR have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FN has higher volatility (25.38%) compared to DTCR (9.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FN dropped -70.46% vs DTCR's -38.98%.

DTCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FN and DTCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer