FN vs. DECK
FN (Fabrinet) and DECK (Deckers Outdoor Corporation) are both stocks. FN operates in Electronic Components (Technology), while DECK operates in Footwear & Accessories (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, FN returned 29.26%/yr vs 26.25%/yr for DECK. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FN vs. DECK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FN achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly higher than DECK's 0.36% return. Over the past 10 years, FN has outperformed DECK with an annualized return of 29.26%, while DECK has yielded a comparatively lower 26.25% annualized return.
FN
- 1D
- 3.32%
- 1M
- -13.86%
- 6M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 1Y
- 58.95%
- 3Y*
- 58.71%
- 5Y*
- 39.38%
- 10Y*
- 29.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 26.76%
DECK
- 1D
- -2.30%
- 1M
- -4.65%
- 6M
- 3.33%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 1Y
- 2.09%
- 3Y*
- 5.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.03%
- 10Y*
- 26.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.95%
FN vs. DECK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FN Fabrinet | 8.56% | 107.06% | 15.53% | 48.44% | 8.23% | 52.69% | 19.66% | 26.37% | 78.78% | -28.78% |
DECK Deckers Outdoor Corporation | 0.36% | -48.95% | 82.30% | 67.46% | 8.97% | 27.73% | 69.83% | 31.97% | 59.44% | 44.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between FN and DECK is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2010 | 0.30 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FN and DECK has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
FN:
$17.71B
DECK:
$14.45B
FN:
$11.64
DECK:
$7.02
FN:
42.46
DECK:
14.81
FN:
1.82
DECK:
0.54
FN:
4.22
DECK:
2.77
FN:
7.77
DECK:
5.89
FN:
$4.24B
DECK:
$5.47B
FN:
$509.75M
DECK:
$3.16B
FN:
$422.55M
DECK:
$1.31B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FN vs. DECK — Risk / Return Rank
FN
DECK
FN vs. DECK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fabrinet (FN) and Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FN | DECK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.05 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 0.06 | +1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.59 | 0.12 | +4.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FN vs. DECK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FN drawdown since its inception was -70.46%, smaller than the maximum DECK drawdown of -94.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FN and DECK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FN | DECK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.46% | -94.36% | +23.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.35% | -35.81% | -2.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.35% | -64.35% | +26.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.70% | -64.35% | +25.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.11% | -64.35% | +13.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.79% | -53.37% | +19.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.62% | -40.39% | +17.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.89% | 17.42% | -4.53% |
Volatility
FN vs. DECK - Volatility Comparison
Fabrinet (FN) has a higher volatility of 20.24% compared to Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) at 11.02%. This indicates that FN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DECK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FN | DECK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.24% | 11.02% | +9.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.58% | 31.81% | +24.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.61% | 45.82% | +23.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.51% | 44.10% | +10.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.71% | 42.55% | +6.16% |
Dividends
FN vs. DECK - Dividend Comparison
Neither FN nor DECK has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
FN vs. DECK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fabrinet and Deckers Outdoor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FN vs. DECK - Profitability Comparison
FN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fabrinet reported a gross profit of 144.34M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.9%.
DECK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported a gross profit of 644.64M and revenue of 1.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.6%.
FN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fabrinet reported an operating income of 120.04M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.
DECK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported an operating income of 156.73M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.
FN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fabrinet reported a net income of 128.18M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.
DECK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported a net income of 135.57M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FN and DECK have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FN has higher volatility (20.24%) compared to DECK (11.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FN dropped -70.46% vs DECK's -94.36%.
FN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FN and DECK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer