PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FN vs. AVGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FN vs. AVGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fabrinet (FN) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF (AVGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FN achieves a 34.21% return, which is significantly higher than AVGX's 3.39% return.


FN

1D
4.94%
1M
-15.38%
YTD
34.21%
6M
29.76%
1Y
149.30%
3Y*
67.62%
5Y*
45.38%
10Y*
32.67%

AVGX

1D
-1.88%
1M
-28.54%
YTD
3.39%
6M
-5.26%
1Y
68.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FN vs. AVGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FN
Fabrinet
34.21%107.06%-19.61%
AVGX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF
3.39%46.98%54.13%

Correlation

The correlation between FN and AVGX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2024

0.54

The correlation between FN and AVGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FN vs. AVGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FN
FN Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FN Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FN Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

AVGX
AVGX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
AVGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FN vs. AVGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fabrinet (FN) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF (AVGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNAVGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.19

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.22

1.08

+5.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.46

2.35

+13.11

FN vs. AVGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FN Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the AVGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FN and AVGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FN vs. AVGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FN drawdown since its inception was -70.46%, roughly equal to the maximum AVGX drawdown of -70.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FN and AVGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNAVGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.46%

-70.97%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.27%

-54.09%

+31.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.15%

-39.65%

+21.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.58%

-23.11%

+0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.95%

24.90%

-15.95%

Volatility

FN vs. AVGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fabrinet (FN) is 24.63%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF (AVGX) has a volatility of 42.68%. This indicates that FN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNAVGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.63%

42.68%

-18.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.18%

71.57%

-15.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.07%

91.19%

-24.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.67%

106.96%

-53.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.29%

106.96%

-58.67%

Dividends

FN vs. AVGX - Dividend Comparison

FN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%.


PositionTTM20252024
AVGX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF
1.60%1.65%0.81%
FN
Fabrinet
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FN and AVGX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVGX has higher volatility (42.68%) compared to FN (24.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FN dropped -70.46% vs AVGX's -70.97%.

FN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FN and AVGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer