PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FN vs. AMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FN vs. AMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fabrinet (FN) and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FN achieves a 26.02% return, which is significantly lower than AMD's 150.92% return. Over the past 10 years, FN has underperformed AMD with an annualized return of 31.23%, while AMD has yielded a comparatively higher 59.32% annualized return.


FN

1D
-1.82%
1M
-18.48%
YTD
26.02%
6M
20.67%
1Y
115.55%
3Y*
64.45%
5Y*
44.47%
10Y*
31.23%

AMD

1D
4.86%
1M
14.94%
YTD
150.92%
6M
151.78%
1Y
319.03%
3Y*
64.79%
5Y*
44.72%
10Y*
59.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FN vs. AMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FN
Fabrinet
26.02%107.06%15.53%48.44%8.23%52.69%19.66%26.37%78.78%-28.78%
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
150.92%77.30%-18.06%127.59%-54.99%56.91%99.98%148.43%79.57%-9.35%

Correlation

The correlation between FN and AMD is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2010

0.37

The correlation between FN and AMD shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FN:

$20.78B

AMD:

$886.66B

EPS

FN:

$11.65

AMD:

$3.05

PE Ratio

FN:

49.26

AMD:

176.21

PEG Ratio

FN:

2.11

AMD:

4.70

PS Ratio

FN:

4.90

AMD:

23.57

PB Ratio

FN:

9.02

AMD:

13.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

FN:

$4.24B

AMD:

$37.45B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FN:

$509.75M

AMD:

$18.83B

EBITDA (TTM)

FN:

$422.55M

AMD:

$7.17B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FN vs. AMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FN
FN Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FN Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FN Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

AMD
AMD Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
AMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMD Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
AMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMD Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FN vs. AMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fabrinet (FN) and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNAMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.59

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.04

11.75

-6.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.51

24.13

-11.62

FN vs. AMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FN Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is lower than the AMD Sharpe Ratio of 4.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FN and AMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FN vs. AMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FN drawdown since its inception was -70.46%, smaller than the maximum AMD drawdown of -96.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FN and AMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNAMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.46%

-96.59%

+26.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.14%

-27.76%

+4.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.47%

-63.00%

+25.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.70%

-65.45%

+26.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.11%

-65.45%

+14.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.14%

-1.81%

-21.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.58%

-56.63%

+34.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.31%

13.50%

-4.19%

Volatility

FN vs. AMD - Volatility Comparison

Fabrinet (FN) and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) have volatilities of 24.51% and 24.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNAMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.51%

24.16%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.49%

50.96%

+4.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.10%

67.04%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.82%

55.90%

-2.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.37%

56.96%

-8.59%

Dividends

FN vs. AMD - Dividend Comparison

Neither FN nor AMD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

FN vs. AMD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fabrinet and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
1.21B
10.25B
(FN) Total Revenue
(AMD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FN vs. AMD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fabrinet and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
11.9%
52.8%
Portfolio components
FN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported a gross profit of 144.34M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.9%.

AMD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.42B and revenue of 10.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.8%.

FN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported an operating income of 120.04M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.

AMD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.48B and revenue of 10.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.

FN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported a net income of 128.18M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.

AMD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. reported a net income of 1.38B and revenue of 10.25B, resulting in a net margin of 13.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FN and AMD have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FN has higher volatility (24.51%) compared to AMD (24.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FN dropped -70.46% vs AMD's -96.59%.

AMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.87 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FN and AMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer