FMUB vs. FLTMX
FMUB (Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF) and FLTMX (Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds from Fidelity. Over the past year, FMUB returned 6.70% vs 5.62% for FLTMX. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FMUB charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for FLTMX.
Performance
FMUB vs. FLTMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMUB achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly higher than FLTMX's 0.90% return.
FMUB
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 1.37%
- YTD
- 2.04%
- 6M
- 2.13%
- 1Y
- 6.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLTMX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- YTD
- 0.90%
- 6M
- 1.35%
- 1Y
- 5.62%
- 3Y*
- 3.87%
- 5Y*
- 1.29%
- 10Y*
- 2.07%
FMUB vs. FLTMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FMUB Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF | 2.04% | 4.69% |
FLTMX Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund | 0.90% | 4.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMUB and FLTMX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025 | 0.59 |
The correlation between FMUB and FLTMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMUB vs. FLTMX — Risk / Return Rank
FMUB
FLTMX
FMUB vs. FLTMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF (FMUB) and Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund (FLTMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FMUB | FLTMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.67 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 1.93 | +0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.73 | 5.91 | +4.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FMUB vs. FLTMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMUB drawdown since its inception was -2.74%, smaller than the maximum FLTMX drawdown of -16.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMUB and FLTMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMUB | FLTMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.74% | -16.13% | +13.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.49% | -2.97% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -10.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -10.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -1.09% | +0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.47% | -1.64% | +1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.63% | 0.97% | -0.34% |
Volatility
FMUB vs. FLTMX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF (FMUB) has a higher volatility of 0.76% compared to Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund (FLTMX) at 0.65%. This indicates that FMUB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMUB | FLTMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.76% | 0.65% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.05% | 1.81% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66% | 2.27% | +0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.63% | 3.05% | +0.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.63% | 3.24% | +0.39% |
FMUB vs. FLTMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMUB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FLTMX's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMUB vs. FLTMX - Dividend Comparison
FMUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than FLTMX's 2.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTMX Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund | 2.88% | 3.70% | 2.47% | 2.42% | 1.36% | 1.67% | 2.00% | 2.39% | 3.31% | 2.64% | 3.20% | 2.36% |
FMUB Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF | 3.42% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMUB and FLTMX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FMUB has higher volatility (0.76%) compared to FLTMX (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMUB dropped -2.74% vs FLTMX's -16.13%.
FMUB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FMUB and FLTMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer