FMTM vs. SMOM
FMTM (MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF) and SMOM (Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FMTM is a Momentum fund, while SMOM is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Symmetry Partners. Both are actively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FMTM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for SMOM.
Performance
FMTM vs. SMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMTM achieves a 31.75% return, which is significantly higher than SMOM's 9.82% return.
FMTM
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 6.28%
- YTD
- 31.75%
- 6M
- 34.74%
- 1Y
- 63.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMOM
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 5.93%
- YTD
- 9.82%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FMTM vs. SMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF | 31.75% | 10.05% |
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 9.82% | 2.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMTM and SMOM is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMTM vs. SMOM — Risk / Return Rank
FMTM
SMOM
FMTM vs. SMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) and Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF (SMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMTM | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.80 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.43 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.28 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.62 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMTM | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.38 | 1.45 | +0.94 |
Drawdowns
FMTM vs. SMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMTM drawdown since its inception was -12.12%, which is greater than SMOM's maximum drawdown of -7.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMTM and SMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMTM | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.12% | -7.45% | -4.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.89% | -1.48% | -0.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | — | — |
Volatility
FMTM vs. SMOM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMTM | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.52% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.83% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.82% | 12.62% | +10.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.94% | 12.62% | +10.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.94% | 12.62% | +10.32% |
FMTM vs. SMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMTM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SMOM's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMTM vs. SMOM - Dividend Comparison
FMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, more than SMOM's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF | 0.22% | 0.30% |
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 0.15% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMTM and SMOM have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FMTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FMTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for SMOM.
FMTM has the higher dividend yield at 0.22%, compared with 0.15% for SMOM.
FMTM is categorized as Momentum, while SMOM is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FMTM and 0.63% for SMOM.
Find the right allocation for FMTM and SMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer