FMTM vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

FMTM (MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FMTM is a Momentum fund, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FMTM returned 54.93% vs 264.10% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.33, they often move in opposite directions. FMTM charges 0.45%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

FMTM vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMTM achieves a 26.52% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -26.97% return.

FMTM

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: -1.87%
• 6M: 19.24%
• YTD: 26.52%
• 1Y: 54.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSTZ

• 1D: -1.53%
• 1M: 39.32%
• 6M: -19.19%
• YTD: -26.97%
• 1Y: 264.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMTM vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF	26.52%	28.21%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-26.97%	25.09%

Correlation

The correlation between FMTM and MSTZ is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2025	-0.33

Return for Risk

FMTM vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMTM

FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 82
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 75
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 90

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 60
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 63
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMTM vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FMTM	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	1.64	+0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	2.34	+0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.30	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.46	2.86	+1.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.90	5.59	+10.32

FMTM vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMTM Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMTM and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FMTM vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMTM drawdown since its inception was -12.12%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMTM and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMTM	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.12%	-99.38%	+87.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.12%	-84.89%	+72.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.83%	-97.51%	+90.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.01%	-94.53%	+92.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.39%	43.41%	-40.02%

Volatility

FMTM vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) is 11.40%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 56.46%. This indicates that FMTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FMTM	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.40%	56.46%	-45.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.31%	135.20%	-114.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.66%	148.41%	-122.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.46%	171.17%	-146.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.46%	171.17%	-146.71%

FMTM vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMTM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

FMTM vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

FMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF	0.23%	0.30%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FMTM and MSTZ in my portfolio?

FMTM and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FMTM or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (56.46%) compared to FMTM (11.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMTM dropped -12.12% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, FMTM or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 264.10% vs 54.93% for FMTM. On fees, FMTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FMTM has been the lower-risk option at 11.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FMTM or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 264.10% return vs 54.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FMTM or MSTZ?

FMTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FMTM or MSTZ?

FMTM has the higher dividend yield at 0.23%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

What is the main difference between FMTM and MSTZ?

FMTM is categorized as Momentum, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FMTM and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.