FMTL vs. URNM
FMTL (First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF) and URNM (Sprott Uranium Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FMTL is a Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the Indxx Global Critical Metals Index, while URNM is a Uranium fund tracking the VettaFi Global Uranium Miners Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FMTL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for URNM.
Performance
FMTL vs. URNM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMTL achieves a 13.89% return, which is significantly higher than URNM's -3.35% return.
FMTL
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- -11.71%
- YTD
- 13.89%
- 6M
- 13.30%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
URNM
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -12.29%
- YTD
- -3.35%
- 6M
- -5.23%
- 1Y
- 14.79%
- 3Y*
- 21.39%
- 5Y*
- 14.05%
- 10Y*
- —
FMTL vs. URNM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FMTL First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF | 13.89% | 21.85% |
URNM Sprott Uranium Miners ETF | -3.35% | -2.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMTL and URNM is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMTL vs. URNM — Risk / Return Rank
FMTL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
URNM
FMTL vs. URNM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF (FMTL) and Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FMTL | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.09 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.38 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.87 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FMTL vs. URNM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMTL drawdown since its inception was -22.44%, smaller than the maximum URNM drawdown of -50.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMTL and URNM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMTL | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.44% | -50.78% | +28.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -38.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -50.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -50.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.61% | -36.84% | +22.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.46% | -18.17% | +12.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 17.01% | — |
Volatility
FMTL vs. URNM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMTL | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 17.44% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 41.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.42% | 52.37% | -11.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.42% | 48.55% | -8.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.42% | 47.00% | -6.58% |
FMTL vs. URNM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMTL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than URNM's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMTL vs. URNM - Dividend Comparison
FMTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than URNM's 3.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMTL First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF | 1.63% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URNM Sprott Uranium Miners ETF | 3.29% | 3.18% | 3.18% | 3.63% | 0.00% | 6.70% | 2.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMTL and URNM have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FMTL is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FMTL is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for URNM.
URNM has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 1.63% for FMTL.
FMTL is categorized as Rare Earth & Strategic Metals, while URNM is Uranium. FMTL tracks Indxx Global Critical Metals Index, while URNM tracks VettaFi Global Uranium Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FMTL and 0.85% for URNM.
Find the right allocation for FMTL and URNM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer