FMQQ vs. OAEM

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

FMQQ (FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF) and OAEM (OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. FMQQ is passively managed, while OAEM is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FMQQ returned 2.72%/yr vs 17.37%/yr for OAEM. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FMQQ charges 0.86%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for OAEM.

Performance

FMQQ vs. OAEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF (FMQQ) and OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMQQ achieves a -12.29% return, which is significantly lower than OAEM's 26.36% return.

FMQQ

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: 4.15%
• 6M: -10.48%
• YTD: -12.29%
• 1Y: -17.84%
• 3Y*: 2.72%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OAEM

• 1D: -2.62%
• 1M: -6.49%
• 6M: 18.65%
• YTD: 26.36%
• 1Y: 41.65%
• 3Y*: 17.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMQQ vs. OAEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FMQQ FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF	-12.29%	10.77%	12.45%	15.15%	-13.45%
OAEM OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF	26.36%	26.67%	0.43%	17.97%	1.40%

Correlation

The correlation between FMQQ and OAEM is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2022	0.64

The correlation between FMQQ and OAEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FMQQ vs. OAEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMQQ

FMQQ Risk / Return Rank: 3
FMQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
FMQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
FMQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3
FMQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
FMQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4

OAEM

OAEM Risk / Return Rank: 62
OAEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
OAEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
OAEM Omega Ratio Rank: 59
OAEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
OAEM Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMQQ vs. OAEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF (FMQQ) and OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FMQQ	OAEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.93	1.57	-2.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.27	2.05	-3.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	1.29	-0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.58	2.86	-3.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.03	10.29	-11.32

FMQQ vs. OAEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMQQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.93, which is lower than the OAEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMQQ and OAEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FMQQ vs. OAEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMQQ drawdown since its inception was -64.51%, which is greater than OAEM's maximum drawdown of -17.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMQQ and OAEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMQQ	OAEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.51%	-17.05%	-47.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.82%	-14.63%	-16.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.82%	-17.05%	-13.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.59%	-10.49%	-42.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-49.46%	-3.90%	-45.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.34%	4.06%	+13.28%

Volatility

FMQQ vs. OAEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF (FMQQ) is 4.24%, while OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM) has a volatility of 11.78%. This indicates that FMQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OAEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FMQQ	OAEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.24%	11.78%	-7.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.28%	24.73%	-8.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.24%	26.60%	-7.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.70%	20.74%	+3.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.70%	20.74%	+3.96%

FMQQ vs. OAEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than OAEM's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

FMQQ vs. OAEM - Dividend Comparison

FMQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than OAEM's 0.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FMQQ FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF	0.70%	0.61%	0.45%	0.11%	0.00%
OAEM OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF	0.61%	0.77%	0.91%	1.63%	0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FMQQ and OAEM in my portfolio?

FMQQ and OAEM have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FMQQ or OAEM?

OAEM has higher volatility (11.78%) compared to FMQQ (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMQQ dropped -64.51% vs OAEM's -17.05%.

Which ETF is better, FMQQ or OAEM?

On 3-year performance, OAEM leads with 17.37% vs 2.72% for FMQQ. On fees, FMQQ is cheaper at 0.86% per year. On volatility, FMQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FMQQ or OAEM?

Over the 3-year period, OAEM has performed better with a 17.37% return vs 2.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FMQQ or OAEM?

FMQQ is cheaper with a 0.86% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for OAEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FMQQ or OAEM?

FMQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.61% for OAEM.

What is the main difference between FMQQ and OAEM?

They also come from different issuers: EMQQ and Oneascent. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for FMQQ and 1.25% for OAEM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OAEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.