PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OAEM vs. OALC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

OAEM vs. OALC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM) and OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

OAEM vs. OALC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
OAEM
OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF
10.06%26.67%0.43%17.97%1.97%
OALC
OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF
-3.32%20.36%19.64%22.03%3.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OAEM achieves a 10.06% return, which is significantly higher than OALC's -3.32% return.


OAEM

1D
4.31%
1M
-10.94%
YTD
10.06%
6M
18.04%
1Y
41.48%
3Y*
13.52%
5Y*
10Y*

OALC

1D
2.70%
1M
-4.81%
YTD
-3.32%
6M
-0.95%
1Y
20.66%
3Y*
16.44%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


OAEM vs. OALC - Expense Ratio Comparison

OAEM has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than OALC's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

OAEM vs. OALC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OAEM
OAEM Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
OAEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OAEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
OAEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
OAEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
OAEM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

OALC
OALC Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
OALC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OALC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
OALC Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
OALC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
OALC Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OAEM vs. OALC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM) and OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OAEMOALCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.86

1.16

+0.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.48

1.74

+0.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.25

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

1.94

+0.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.06

9.19

+2.87

OAEM vs. OALC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OAEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the OALC Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OAEM and OALC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OAEMOALCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

1.16

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.45

+0.39

Correlation

The correlation between OAEM and OALC is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

OAEM vs. OALC - Dividend Comparison

OAEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than OALC's 0.63% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
OAEM
OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF
0.70%0.77%0.91%1.63%0.04%0.00%
OALC
OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF
0.63%0.61%0.70%0.40%0.40%0.06%

Drawdowns

OAEM vs. OALC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OAEM drawdown since its inception was -17.05%, smaller than the maximum OALC drawdown of -26.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAEM and OALC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


OAEMOALCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.05%

-26.82%

+9.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.63%

-10.89%

-3.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.94%

-5.95%

-4.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.94%

-7.29%

+3.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

2.30%

+1.08%

Volatility

OAEM vs. OALC - Volatility Comparison

OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM) has a higher volatility of 13.45% compared to OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) at 5.58%. This indicates that OAEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OALC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


OAEMOALCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.45%

5.58%

+7.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.65%

10.09%

+7.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.39%

17.88%

+4.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.00%

17.41%

+1.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.00%

17.41%

+1.59%