PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMQQ vs. IEMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMQQ vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF (FMQQ) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMQQ achieves a -17.33% return, which is significantly lower than IEMG's 21.95% return.


FMQQ

1D
-1.59%
1M
0.22%
YTD
-17.33%
6M
-17.61%
1Y
-20.84%
3Y*
2.61%
5Y*
10Y*

IEMG

1D
-5.44%
1M
1.74%
YTD
21.95%
6M
22.64%
1Y
43.66%
3Y*
22.14%
5Y*
7.05%
10Y*
10.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMQQ vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FMQQ
FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF
-17.33%10.77%12.45%15.15%-54.03%-16.57%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
21.95%32.56%6.50%11.52%-19.98%-2.36%

Correlation

The correlation between FMQQ and IEMG is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2021

0.72

The correlation between FMQQ and IEMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMQQ vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMQQ
FMQQ Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FMQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FMQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

IEMG
IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMQQ vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF (FMQQ) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMQQIEMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

1.38

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.68

3.32

-4.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.28

12.15

-13.42

FMQQ vs. IEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMQQ Sharpe Ratio is -1.09, which is lower than the IEMG Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMQQ and IEMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMQQ vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMQQ drawdown since its inception was -64.51%, which is greater than IEMG's maximum drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMQQ and IEMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMQQIEMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.51%

-38.71%

-25.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.82%

-13.21%

-17.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.82%

-17.21%

-13.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.31%

-5.44%

-49.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.41%

-12.93%

-36.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.34%

3.61%

+12.73%

Volatility

FMQQ vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF (FMQQ) is 6.10%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a volatility of 12.22%. This indicates that FMQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMQQIEMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.10%

12.22%

-6.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.16%

20.14%

-3.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.25%

22.12%

-2.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.80%

18.99%

+5.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.80%

20.20%

+4.60%

FMQQ vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMQQ vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison

FMQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than IEMG's 2.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMQQ
FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF
0.74%0.61%0.45%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.21%2.75%3.20%2.89%2.71%3.06%1.87%3.15%2.76%2.35%2.28%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMQQ and IEMG have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IEMG has higher volatility (12.22%) compared to FMQQ (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMQQ dropped -64.51% vs IEMG's -38.71%.

On 3-year performance, IEMG leads with 22.14% vs 2.61% for FMQQ. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FMQQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IEMG has performed better with a 22.14% return vs 2.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for FMQQ.

IEMG has the higher dividend yield at 2.21%, compared with 0.74% for FMQQ.

FMQQ tracks FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce Index - Benchmark TR Net, while IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). They also come from different issuers: EMQQ and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for FMQQ and 0.09% for IEMG.

IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMQQ and IEMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer