FMQQ vs. DIEM
FMQQ (FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF) and DIEM (Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds - FMQQ tracks the FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce Index - Benchmark TR Net while DIEM tracks the Morningstar Emerging Markets Dividend Enhanced Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FMQQ returned 2.69%/yr vs 28.94%/yr for DIEM. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FMQQ charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for DIEM.
Performance
FMQQ vs. DIEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMQQ achieves a -16.41% return, which is significantly lower than DIEM's 34.62% return.
FMQQ
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -3.97%
- YTD
- -16.41%
- 6M
- -19.47%
- 1Y
- -18.97%
- 3Y*
- 2.69%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIEM
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- 13.76%
- YTD
- 34.62%
- 6M
- 37.79%
- 1Y
- 63.44%
- 3Y*
- 28.94%
- 5Y*
- 11.95%
- 10Y*
- —
FMQQ vs. DIEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMQQ FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF | -16.41% | 10.77% | 12.45% | 15.15% | -54.03% | -15.21% |
DIEM Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 34.62% | 30.81% | 12.29% | 15.41% | -20.61% | 2.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMQQ and DIEM is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2021 | 0.67 |
The correlation between FMQQ and DIEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
FMQQ vs. DIEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FMQQ
DIEM
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
FMQQ
DIEM
Technology
FMQQ
DIEM
Communication Services
FMQQ
DIEM
Financial Services
FMQQ
DIEM
Utilities
FMQQ
DIEM
Real Estate
FMQQ
DIEM
Consumer Defensive
FMQQ
DIEM
Industrials
FMQQ
DIEM
Basic Materials
FMQQ
-
DIEM
Energy
FMQQ
-
DIEM
Healthcare
FMQQ
-
DIEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMQQ vs. DIEM — Risk / Return Rank
FMQQ
DIEM
FMQQ vs. DIEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF (FMQQ) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMQQ | DIEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | 3.52 | -4.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.40 | 4.44 | -5.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.66 | -0.81 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 5.18 | -5.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | 21.41 | -22.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMQQ | DIEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.01 | 3.52 | -4.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.61 | 0.56 | -1.16 |
Drawdowns
FMQQ vs. DIEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMQQ drawdown since its inception was -64.51%, which is greater than DIEM's maximum drawdown of -38.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMQQ and DIEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMQQ | DIEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.51% | -38.61% | -25.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.82% | -12.33% | -18.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.82% | -16.82% | -14.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.81% | 0.00% | -54.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.37% | -9.72% | -39.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.99% | 2.98% | +12.01% |
Volatility
FMQQ vs. DIEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF (FMQQ) is 5.83%, while Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) has a volatility of 8.30%. This indicates that FMQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMQQ | DIEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.83% | 8.30% | -2.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.50% | 15.83% | -0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.92% | 18.10% | +0.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.81% | 16.92% | +7.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.81% | 17.59% | +7.22% |
FMQQ vs. DIEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than DIEM's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMQQ vs. DIEM - Dividend Comparison
FMQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than DIEM's 2.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIEM Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 2.27% | 2.99% | 4.92% | 4.45% | 6.31% | 4.06% | 2.75% | 5.98% | 3.87% | 2.61% | 0.35% |
FMQQ FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF | 0.73% | 0.61% | 0.45% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMQQ and DIEM have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIEM has higher volatility (8.30%) compared to FMQQ (5.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMQQ dropped -64.51% vs DIEM's -38.61%.
On 3-year performance, DIEM leads with 28.94% vs 2.69% for FMQQ. On fees, DIEM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FMQQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DIEM has performed better with a 28.94% return vs 2.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIEM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for FMQQ.
DIEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 0.73% for FMQQ.
FMQQ tracks FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce Index - Benchmark TR Net, while DIEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Dividend Enhanced Select Index. They also come from different issuers: EMQQ and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for FMQQ and 0.19% for DIEM.
DIEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.52 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FMQQ and DIEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer