FMNY vs. CGSM
FMNY (First Trust New York High Income Municipal ETF) and CGSM (Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FMNY returned 7.40% vs 4.67% for CGSM. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FMNY charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CGSM.
Performance
FMNY vs. CGSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMNY achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly higher than CGSM's 1.37% return.
FMNY
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 2.18%
- 1Y
- 7.40%
- 3Y*
- 4.02%
- 5Y*
- 0.58%
- 10Y*
- —
CGSM
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 1.37%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- 1Y
- 4.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FMNY vs. CGSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FMNY First Trust New York High Income Municipal ETF | 1.81% | 3.94% | 1.74% | 7.82% |
CGSM Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF | 1.37% | 4.58% | 3.71% | 4.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMNY and CGSM is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2023 | 0.50 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FMNY and CGSM has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMNY vs. CGSM — Risk / Return Rank
FMNY
CGSM
FMNY vs. CGSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust New York High Income Municipal ETF (FMNY) and Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (CGSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMNY | CGSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.82 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 3.98 | -1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.50 | 13.02 | -4.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMNY | CGSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.26 | 3.52 | -1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 2.89 | -2.71 |
Drawdowns
FMNY vs. CGSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMNY drawdown since its inception was -15.90%, which is greater than CGSM's maximum drawdown of -1.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMNY and CGSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMNY | CGSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.90% | -1.42% | -14.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.83% | -1.18% | -1.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -0.14% | -0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.68% | -0.24% | -5.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.87% | 0.36% | +0.51% |
Volatility
FMNY vs. CGSM - Volatility Comparison
First Trust New York High Income Municipal ETF (FMNY) has a higher volatility of 0.84% compared to Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (CGSM) at 0.43%. This indicates that FMNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMNY | CGSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.84% | 0.43% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.37% | 0.98% | +1.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.29% | 1.33% | +1.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.00% | 1.79% | +2.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.99% | 1.79% | +2.20% |
FMNY vs. CGSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMNY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CGSM's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMNY vs. CGSM - Dividend Comparison
FMNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, more than CGSM's 2.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGSM Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF | 2.99% | 3.05% | 3.11% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FMNY First Trust New York High Income Municipal ETF | 3.69% | 3.64% | 3.56% | 3.25% | 2.34% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMNY and CGSM have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FMNY has higher volatility (0.84%) compared to CGSM (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMNY dropped -15.90% vs CGSM's -1.42%.
On 1-year performance, FMNY leads with 7.40% vs 4.67% for CGSM. On fees, CGSM is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, CGSM has been the lower-risk option at 0.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FMNY has performed better with a 7.40% return vs 4.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CGSM is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FMNY.
FMNY has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 2.99% for CGSM.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FMNY and 0.25% for CGSM.
CGSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.52 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FMNY and CGSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer