PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMNY vs. NYF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMNY vs. NYF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust New York High Income Municipal ETF (FMNY) and iShares New York Muni Bond ETF (NYF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMNY achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly higher than NYF's 1.63% return.


FMNY

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.52%
YTD
1.81%
6M
2.18%
1Y
7.40%
3Y*
4.02%
5Y*
0.58%
10Y*

NYF

1D
0.11%
1M
0.67%
YTD
1.63%
6M
1.96%
1Y
6.74%
3Y*
3.29%
5Y*
0.85%
10Y*
1.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMNY vs. NYF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FMNY
First Trust New York High Income Municipal ETF
1.81%3.94%1.74%6.14%-10.65%1.60%
NYF
iShares New York Muni Bond ETF
1.63%3.64%1.13%5.76%-7.75%0.80%

Correlation

The correlation between FMNY and NYF is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2021

0.68

The correlation between FMNY and NYF shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMNY vs. NYF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMNY
FMNY Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FMNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMNY Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FMNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMNY Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

NYF
NYF Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
NYF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NYF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
NYF Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
NYF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
NYF Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMNY vs. NYF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust New York High Income Municipal ETF (FMNY) and iShares New York Muni Bond ETF (NYF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMNYNYFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.53

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

2.45

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.50

8.79

-0.30

FMNY vs. NYF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMNY Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the NYF Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMNY and NYF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMNYNYFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

2.44

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.21

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.47

-0.29

Drawdowns

FMNY vs. NYF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMNY drawdown since its inception was -15.90%, which is greater than NYF's maximum drawdown of -13.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMNY and NYF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMNYNYFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.90%

-13.12%

-2.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.83%

-2.76%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.88%

-5.68%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.90%

-12.71%

-3.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-0.45%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.68%

-2.31%

-3.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

0.77%

+0.10%

Volatility

FMNY vs. NYF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust New York High Income Municipal ETF (FMNY) is 0.84%, while iShares New York Muni Bond ETF (NYF) has a volatility of 0.96%. This indicates that FMNY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NYF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMNYNYFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.84%

0.96%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.37%

2.08%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.29%

2.78%

+0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.00%

4.00%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.99%

4.48%

-0.49%

FMNY vs. NYF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMNY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than NYF's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMNY vs. NYF - Dividend Comparison

FMNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, more than NYF's 3.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMNY
First Trust New York High Income Municipal ETF
3.69%3.64%3.56%3.25%2.34%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NYF
iShares New York Muni Bond ETF
3.09%2.99%2.77%2.36%2.04%1.85%1.98%2.19%2.48%2.46%2.43%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMNY and NYF have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NYF has higher volatility (0.96%) compared to FMNY (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMNY dropped -15.90% vs NYF's -13.12%.

On 5-year performance, NYF leads with 0.85% vs 0.58% for FMNY. On fees, NYF is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FMNY has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NYF has performed better with a 0.85% return vs 0.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NYF is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FMNY.

FMNY has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 3.09% for NYF.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FMNY and 0.25% for NYF.

NYF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMNY and NYF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer