FMNY vs. SCHG
FMNY (First Trust New York High Income Municipal ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FMNY is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by First Trust, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. FMNY is actively managed, while SCHG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FMNY returned 0.58%/yr vs 15.67%/yr for SCHG. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FMNY charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
FMNY vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMNY achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 6.78% return.
FMNY
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 2.18%
- 1Y
- 7.40%
- 3Y*
- 4.02%
- 5Y*
- 0.58%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 4.73%
- YTD
- 6.78%
- 6M
- 6.01%
- 1Y
- 24.63%
- 3Y*
- 25.14%
- 5Y*
- 15.67%
- 10Y*
- 18.74%
FMNY vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMNY First Trust New York High Income Municipal ETF | 1.81% | 3.94% | 1.74% | 6.14% | -10.65% | 1.60% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 6.78% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 24.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMNY and SCHG is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2021 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMNY vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
FMNY
SCHG
FMNY vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust New York High Income Municipal ETF (FMNY) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMNY | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.28 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 1.51 | +1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.50 | 5.04 | +3.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMNY | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.26 | 1.60 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.71 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.85 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
FMNY vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMNY drawdown since its inception was -15.90%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMNY and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMNY | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.90% | -34.59% | +18.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.83% | -16.41% | +13.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.88% | -23.39% | +17.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.90% | -34.59% | +18.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -1.44% | +0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.68% | -5.20% | -0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.87% | 4.90% | -4.03% |
Volatility
FMNY vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust New York High Income Municipal ETF (FMNY) is 0.84%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that FMNY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMNY | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.84% | 3.61% | -2.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.37% | 11.62% | -9.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.29% | 15.49% | -12.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.00% | 22.26% | -18.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.99% | 21.55% | -17.56% |
FMNY vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMNY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMNY vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
FMNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMNY First Trust New York High Income Municipal ETF | 3.69% | 3.64% | 3.56% | 3.25% | 2.34% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.36% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMNY and SCHG have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHG has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to FMNY (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMNY dropped -15.90% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
On 5-year performance, SCHG leads with 15.67% vs 0.58% for FMNY. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, FMNY has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 15.67% return vs 0.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FMNY.
FMNY has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 0.36% for SCHG.
FMNY is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FMNY and 0.04% for SCHG.
FMNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FMNY and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer