PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMNA.NEO vs. FBTC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMNA.NEO vs. FBTC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity Market Neutral Alternative Fund ETF Series (FMNA.NEO) and Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMNA.NEO achieves a 2.42% return, which is significantly higher than FBTC.TO's -24.39% return.


FMNA.NEO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.09%
YTD
2.42%
6M
3.94%
1Y
3.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FBTC.TO

1D
-2.22%
1M
-16.83%
YTD
-24.39%
6M
-30.03%
1Y
-37.95%
3Y*
34.59%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMNA.NEO vs. FBTC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FMNA.NEO
Fidelity Market Neutral Alternative Fund ETF Series
2.42%0.59%2.50%
FBTC.TO
Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF
-24.39%-10.85%131.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FMNA.NEO and FBTC.TO is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2024

0.02

The correlation between FMNA.NEO and FBTC.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMNA.NEO vs. FBTC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMNA.NEO
FMNA.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FMNA.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMNA.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMNA.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FMNA.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMNA.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

FBTC.TO
FBTC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FBTC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMNA.NEO vs. FBTC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Market Neutral Alternative Fund ETF Series (FMNA.NEO) and Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMNA.NEOFBTC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

0.86

+0.68

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

-0.76

+2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.89

-1.30

+5.19

FMNA.NEO vs. FBTC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMNA.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is higher than the FBTC.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMNA.NEO and FBTC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMNA.NEOFBTC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

-0.89

+1.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.08

+0.32

Drawdowns

FMNA.NEO vs. FBTC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMNA.NEO drawdown since its inception was -5.37%, smaller than the maximum FBTC.TO drawdown of -70.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMNA.NEO and FBTC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMNA.NEOFBTC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.37%

-70.77%

+65.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.85%

-50.22%

+47.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-48.38%

+48.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.47%

-30.94%

+29.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

29.18%

-28.22%

Volatility

FMNA.NEO vs. FBTC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Market Neutral Alternative Fund ETF Series (FMNA.NEO) is 0.40%, while Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) has a volatility of 9.72%. This indicates that FMNA.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBTC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMNA.NEOFBTC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.40%

9.72%

-9.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.45%

33.63%

-30.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.76%

42.84%

-38.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.93%

52.37%

-46.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.93%

52.37%

-46.44%

FMNA.NEO vs. FBTC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMNA.NEO has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FBTC.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMNA.NEO vs. FBTC.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither FMNA.NEO nor FBTC.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FMNA.NEO and FBTC.TO have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FBTC.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FBTC.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for FMNA.NEO.

FMNA.NEO is categorized as Equity Market Neutral, while FBTC.TO is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for FMNA.NEO and 0.40% for FBTC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMNA.NEO and FBTC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer