FMNA.NEO vs. FEQT.NEO
FMNA.NEO (Fidelity Market Neutral Alternative Fund ETF Series) and FEQT.NEO (Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FMNA.NEO is a Equity Market Neutral fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FEQT.NEO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FMNA.NEO returned 3.73% vs 25.84% for FEQT.NEO. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FMNA.NEO charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for FEQT.NEO.
Performance
FMNA.NEO vs. FEQT.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMNA.NEO achieves a 2.42% return, which is significantly lower than FEQT.NEO's 10.90% return.
FMNA.NEO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 2.42%
- 6M
- 3.94%
- 1Y
- 3.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FEQT.NEO
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 4.10%
- YTD
- 10.90%
- 6M
- 10.77%
- 1Y
- 25.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FMNA.NEO vs. FEQT.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FMNA.NEO Fidelity Market Neutral Alternative Fund ETF Series | 2.42% | 0.59% | 0.29% |
FEQT.NEO Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund | 10.90% | 19.42% | 14.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMNA.NEO and FEQT.NEO is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2024 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMNA.NEO vs. FEQT.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
FMNA.NEO
FEQT.NEO
FMNA.NEO vs. FEQT.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Market Neutral Alternative Fund ETF Series (FMNA.NEO) and Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMNA.NEO | FEQT.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.44 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 3.12 | -1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.89 | 13.53 | -9.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMNA.NEO | FEQT.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 2.36 | -1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 1.79 | -1.39 |
Drawdowns
FMNA.NEO vs. FEQT.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMNA.NEO drawdown since its inception was -5.37%, smaller than the maximum FEQT.NEO drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMNA.NEO and FEQT.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMNA.NEO | FEQT.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.37% | -13.24% | +7.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.85% | -8.31% | +5.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.48% | +0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.47% | -1.45% | -0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | 1.91% | -0.95% |
Volatility
FMNA.NEO vs. FEQT.NEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Market Neutral Alternative Fund ETF Series (FMNA.NEO) is 0.40%, while Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) has a volatility of 3.90%. This indicates that FMNA.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEQT.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMNA.NEO | FEQT.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.40% | 3.90% | -3.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.45% | 8.89% | -5.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.76% | 11.02% | -6.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.93% | 12.44% | -6.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.93% | 12.44% | -6.51% |
FMNA.NEO vs. FEQT.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMNA.NEO has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FEQT.NEO's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMNA.NEO vs. FEQT.NEO - Dividend Comparison
FMNA.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FEQT.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FEQT.NEO Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund | 0.82% | 0.91% | 0.91% |
FMNA.NEO Fidelity Market Neutral Alternative Fund ETF Series | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMNA.NEO and FEQT.NEO have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FEQT.NEO is cheaper at 0.43% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FEQT.NEO is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for FMNA.NEO.
FMNA.NEO is categorized as Equity Market Neutral, while FEQT.NEO is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for FMNA.NEO and 0.43% for FEQT.NEO.
Find the right allocation for FMNA.NEO and FEQT.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer