FMKT vs. SPTM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FMKT (The Free Markets ETF) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. FMKT is actively managed, while SPTM is passively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FMKT charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTM.

Performance

FMKT vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Free Markets ETF (FMKT) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMKT achieves a 2.65% return, which is significantly lower than SPTM's 11.10% return.

FMKT

• 1D: -2.40%
• 1M: -0.64%
• YTD: 2.65%
• 6M: 0.39%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPTM

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 4.87%
• YTD: 11.10%
• 6M: 11.13%
• 1Y: 27.84%
• 3Y*: 21.90%
• 5Y*: 13.38%
• 10Y*: 15.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMKT vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FMKT The Free Markets ETF	2.65%	10.93%
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF	11.10%	13.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FMKT and SPTM is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025	0.72

Return for Risk

FMKT vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPTM

SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 70
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 69
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMKT vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Free Markets ETF (FMKT) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FMKT	SPTM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.85	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	0.46	+0.27

Drawdowns

FMKT vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMKT drawdown since its inception was -17.79%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMKT and SPTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMKT	SPTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.79%	-54.80%	+37.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.68%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.87%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.14%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.86%	-0.67%	-6.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.25%	-9.05%	+3.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.86%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FMKT	SPTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.88%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.92%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.59%	11.88%	+7.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.59%	16.87%	+2.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.59%	18.03%	+1.56%

FMKT vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMKT has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

FMKT vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison

FMKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, more than SPTM's 1.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FMKT The Free Markets ETF	2.10%	2.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF	1.04%	1.13%	1.28%	1.44%	1.69%	1.25%	1.56%	1.72%	1.90%	1.66%	1.91%	1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FMKT and SPTM in my portfolio?

FMKT and SPTM have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FMKT or SPTM?

On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FMKT or SPTM?

SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for FMKT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FMKT or SPTM?

FMKT has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 1.04% for SPTM.

What is the main difference between FMKT and SPTM?

Their fees differ too: 0.76% for FMKT and 0.03% for SPTM.