PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMKT vs. BUFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMKT vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Free Markets ETF (FMKT) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMKT achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly lower than BUFX's 5.06% return.


FMKT

1D
0.42%
1M
-1.23%
6M
-0.59%
YTD
0.86%
1Y
2.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.59%

BUFX

1D
0.27%
1M
0.68%
6M
4.54%
YTD
5.06%
1Y
9.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$98.01K$102.06K$119.53K
$56.87K$86.94K$97.49K

FMKT vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FMKT and BUFX is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025

0.63

The correlation between FMKT and BUFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMKT vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FMKT
FMKT Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
FMKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMKT Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
FMKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMKT Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFX
BUFX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
BUFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FMKT vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Free Markets ETF (FMKT) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMKTBUFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.49

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.09

3.28

-3.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.21

19.17

-18.96

FMKT vs. BUFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMKT Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is lower than the BUFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMKT and BUFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMKT vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMKT drawdown since its inception was -17.79%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMKT and BUFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMKTBUFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.79%

-2.87%

-14.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.79%

-2.87%

-14.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.48%

0.00%

-8.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.62%

-0.24%

-5.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.31%

0.49%

+6.82%

Volatility

FMKT vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison

The Free Markets ETF (FMKT) has a higher volatility of 4.70% compared to FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX) at 0.99%. This indicates that FMKT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMKTBUFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.70%

0.99%

+3.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.90%

3.45%

+11.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.64%

4.10%

+15.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.17%

3.96%

+15.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.17%

3.96%

+15.21%

FMKT vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMKT has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMKT vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison

FMKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


FMKT and BUFX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMKT has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to BUFX (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMKT dropped -17.79% vs BUFX's -2.87%.

On 1-year performance, BUFX leads with 9.79% vs 2.63% for FMKT. On fees, FMKT is cheaper at 0.76% per year. On volatility, BUFX has been the lower-risk option at 0.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BUFX has performed better with a 9.79% return vs 2.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FMKT is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.

FMKT has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.

FMKT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for FMKT and 0.96% for BUFX.

BUFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMKT and BUFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer