PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMKT vs. FTIF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMKT vs. FTIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Free Markets ETF (FMKT) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMKT achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly lower than FTIF's 20.97% return.


FMKT

1D
-0.98%
1M
-2.33%
YTD
1.47%
6M
-0.39%
1Y
10.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTIF

1D
-0.96%
1M
-2.83%
YTD
20.97%
6M
19.74%
1Y
29.74%
3Y*
14.08%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMKT vs. FTIF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FMKT and FTIF is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2025

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMKT vs. FTIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMKT
FMKT Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
FMKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMKT Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
FMKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMKT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

FTIF
FTIF Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FTIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTIF Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FTIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTIF Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMKT vs. FTIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Free Markets ETF (FMKT) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMKTFTIFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.33

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.57

5.47

-4.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.49

15.23

-13.74

FMKT vs. FTIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMKT Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the FTIF Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMKT and FTIF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMKT vs. FTIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMKT drawdown since its inception was -17.79%, smaller than the maximum FTIF drawdown of -27.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMKT and FTIF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMKTFTIFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.79%

-27.83%

+10.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.79%

-5.46%

-12.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.93%

-4.32%

-3.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.37%

-5.95%

+0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.81%

1.96%

+4.85%

Volatility

FMKT vs. FTIF - Volatility Comparison

The Free Markets ETF (FMKT) has a higher volatility of 5.56% compared to First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) at 4.57%. This indicates that FMKT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMKTFTIFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.56%

4.57%

+0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.22%

10.75%

+4.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.76%

15.38%

+4.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.60%

18.92%

+0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.60%

18.92%

+0.68%

FMKT vs. FTIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMKT has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FTIF's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMKT vs. FTIF - Dividend Comparison

FMKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, more than FTIF's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
FMKT
The Free Markets ETF
2.12%2.15%0.00%0.00%
FTIF
First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF
1.15%1.45%2.88%1.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMKT and FTIF have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMKT has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to FTIF (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMKT dropped -17.79% vs FTIF's -27.83%.

On 1-year performance, FTIF leads with 29.74% vs 10.12% for FMKT. On fees, FTIF is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FTIF has been the lower-risk option at 4.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FTIF has performed better with a 29.74% return vs 10.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTIF is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for FMKT.

FMKT has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 1.15% for FTIF.

Their fees differ too: 0.76% for FMKT and 0.60% for FTIF.

FTIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMKT and FTIF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer