PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMGIX vs. FLIAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMGIX vs. FLIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund (FMGIX) and First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund (FLIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMGIX achieves a 8.65% return, which is significantly lower than FLIAX's 17.06% return.


FMGIX

1D
0.29%
1M
-1.35%
6M
4.62%
YTD
8.65%
1Y
12.99%
3Y*
21.68%
5Y*
12.12%
10Y*
9.69%
ALL TIME*
10.38%

FLIAX

1D
-0.69%
1M
-0.26%
6M
13.04%
YTD
17.06%
1Y
8.36%
3Y*
10.28%
5Y*
6.55%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FMGIX vs. FLIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FMGIX
Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund
8.65%22.67%34.26%4.86%-9.46%15.88%
FLIAX
First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund
17.06%-0.20%12.21%0.59%-5.85%24.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FMGIX and FLIAX is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2021

0.81

The correlation between FMGIX and FLIAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMGIX vs. FLIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FMGIX
FMGIX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FMGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
FMGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

FLIAX
FLIAX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
FLIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
FLIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FMGIX vs. FLIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund (FMGIX) and First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund (FLIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMGIXFLIAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.13

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

0.77

+1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.33

2.52

+2.81

FMGIX vs. FLIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is higher than the FLIAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMGIX and FLIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMGIX vs. FLIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMGIX drawdown since its inception was -57.57%, which is greater than FLIAX's maximum drawdown of -23.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMGIX and FLIAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMGIXFLIAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.57%

-23.23%

-34.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.11%

-12.50%

+5.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.56%

-12.50%

-8.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.61%

-23.23%

-3.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.53%

-3.19%

-0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-6.31%

+0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

3.60%

-1.04%

Volatility

FMGIX vs. FLIAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund (FMGIX) is 3.18%, while First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund (FLIAX) has a volatility of 4.19%. This indicates that FMGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMGIXFLIAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

4.19%

-1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.02%

10.32%

-1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.58%

15.99%

-5.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.53%

16.14%

+12.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.56%

15.78%

+36.78%

FMGIX vs. FLIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMGIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FLIAX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMGIX vs. FLIAX - Dividend Comparison

FMGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.68%, while FLIAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLIAX
First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund
0.00%0.00%6.21%2.90%19.90%5.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FMGIX
Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund
30.68%33.65%48.77%4.79%3.98%2.63%2.38%2.63%3.09%3.15%2.83%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMGIX and FLIAX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLIAX has higher volatility (4.19%) compared to FMGIX (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMGIX dropped -57.57% vs FLIAX's -23.23%.

FMGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMGIX and FLIAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer