FMGIX vs. CFWAX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FMGIX (Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund) and CFWAX (Calvert Global Water Fund) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FMGIX returned 10.00%/yr vs 8.63%/yr for CFWAX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FMGIX charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.24%/yr for CFWAX.

Performance

FMGIX vs. CFWAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund (FMGIX) and Calvert Global Water Fund (CFWAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMGIX achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly higher than CFWAX's 5.66% return. Over the past 10 years, FMGIX has outperformed CFWAX with an annualized return of 10.00%, while CFWAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.63% annualized return.

FMGIX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -0.64%
• YTD: 8.61%
• 6M: 9.36%
• 1Y: 16.06%
• 3Y*: 21.17%
• 5Y*: 12.41%
• 10Y*: 10.00%

CFWAX

• 1D: 1.02%
• 1M: 2.26%
• YTD: 5.66%
• 6M: 4.97%
• 1Y: 12.95%
• 3Y*: 9.56%
• 5Y*: 5.83%
• 10Y*: 8.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMGIX vs. CFWAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FMGIX Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund	8.61%	22.67%	34.26%	4.86%	-9.46%	13.84%	-1.36%	28.00%	-6.62%	20.25%
CFWAX Calvert Global Water Fund	5.66%	14.38%	3.91%	18.34%	-19.63%	22.59%	14.79%	28.02%	-13.63%	18.88%

Correlation

The correlation between FMGIX and CFWAX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2012	0.66

The correlation between FMGIX and CFWAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FMGIX vs. CFWAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMGIX

FMGIX Risk / Return Rank: 32
FMGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
FMGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
FMGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
FMGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
FMGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

CFWAX

CFWAX Risk / Return Rank: 11
CFWAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
CFWAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
CFWAX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
CFWAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
CFWAX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMGIX vs. CFWAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund (FMGIX) and Calvert Global Water Fund (CFWAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FMGIX	CFWAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	0.90	+0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	1.36	+0.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.16	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.25	0.98	+1.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.70	2.75	+3.94

FMGIX vs. CFWAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the CFWAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMGIX and CFWAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FMGIX vs. CFWAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMGIX drawdown since its inception was -57.57%, which is greater than CFWAX's maximum drawdown of -39.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMGIX and CFWAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMGIX	CFWAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.57%	-39.67%	-17.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.11%	-12.79%	+5.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.56%	-17.64%	-2.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.61%	-29.17%	+2.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.57%	-36.25%	-21.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.57%	-5.69%	+2.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.33%	-7.96%	+2.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.38%	4.53%	-2.15%

Volatility

FMGIX vs. CFWAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund (FMGIX) is 3.56%, while Calvert Global Water Fund (CFWAX) has a volatility of 3.91%. This indicates that FMGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CFWAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FMGIX	CFWAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.56%	3.91%	-0.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.66%	10.95%	-2.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.49%	13.90%	-3.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.52%	15.76%	+12.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.57%	16.94%	+35.63%

FMGIX vs. CFWAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMGIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CFWAX's 1.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

FMGIX vs. CFWAX - Dividend Comparison

FMGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.96%, more than CFWAX's 4.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CFWAX Calvert Global Water Fund	4.52%	4.77%	9.25%	2.57%	1.47%	0.93%	0.77%	0.83%	1.30%	0.93%	0.00%	0.03%
FMGIX Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund	30.96%	33.65%	48.77%	4.79%	3.98%	2.63%	2.38%	2.63%	3.09%	3.15%	2.83%	2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FMGIX and CFWAX in my portfolio?

FMGIX and CFWAX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FMGIX or CFWAX?

CFWAX has higher volatility (3.91%) compared to FMGIX (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMGIX dropped -57.57% vs CFWAX's -39.67%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.