PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMGIX vs. PGNAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMGIX vs. PGNAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund (FMGIX) and PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund (PGNAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMGIX achieves a 8.76% return, which is significantly lower than PGNAX's 17.78% return. Over the past 10 years, FMGIX has underperformed PGNAX with an annualized return of 10.30%, while PGNAX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.87% annualized return.


FMGIX

1D
0.14%
1M
-0.50%
YTD
8.76%
6M
8.76%
1Y
15.02%
3Y*
22.49%
5Y*
12.56%
10Y*
10.30%

PGNAX

1D
0.86%
1M
-3.24%
YTD
17.78%
6M
16.07%
1Y
47.66%
3Y*
20.12%
5Y*
15.60%
10Y*
10.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMGIX vs. PGNAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMGIX
Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund
8.76%22.67%34.26%4.86%-9.46%13.84%-1.36%28.00%-6.62%20.25%
PGNAX
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund
17.78%38.58%0.80%-2.22%24.40%27.22%11.22%16.50%-27.87%4.99%

Correlation

The correlation between FMGIX and PGNAX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2012

0.42

The correlation between FMGIX and PGNAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMGIX vs. PGNAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMGIX
FMGIX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
FMGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FMGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

PGNAX
PGNAX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PGNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
PGNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMGIX vs. PGNAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund (FMGIX) and PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund (PGNAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMGIXPGNAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.38

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

4.30

-2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.80

14.60

-7.80

FMGIX vs. PGNAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the PGNAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMGIX and PGNAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMGIX vs. PGNAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMGIX drawdown since its inception was -57.57%, smaller than the maximum PGNAX drawdown of -76.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMGIX and PGNAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMGIXPGNAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.57%

-76.46%

+18.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.11%

-11.05%

+3.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.56%

-25.21%

+4.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.61%

-29.24%

+2.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.57%

-63.86%

+6.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.43%

-6.85%

+3.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.33%

-20.20%

+14.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.39%

3.25%

-0.86%

Volatility

FMGIX vs. PGNAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund (FMGIX) is 3.50%, while PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund (PGNAX) has a volatility of 7.83%. This indicates that FMGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGNAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMGIXPGNAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

7.83%

-4.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.66%

17.79%

-9.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.51%

21.79%

-11.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.53%

25.34%

+3.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.60%

26.46%

+26.14%

FMGIX vs. PGNAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMGIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PGNAX's 1.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMGIX vs. PGNAX - Dividend Comparison

FMGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.92%, more than PGNAX's 0.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMGIX
Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund
30.92%33.65%48.77%4.79%3.98%2.63%2.38%2.63%3.09%3.15%2.83%2.79%
PGNAX
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund
0.82%0.96%0.98%1.93%2.75%0.84%1.32%1.78%1.59%0.00%1.15%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMGIX and PGNAX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PGNAX has higher volatility (7.83%) compared to FMGIX (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMGIX dropped -57.57% vs PGNAX's -76.46%.

PGNAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMGIX and PGNAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer