FMDE vs. IMCB
FMDE (Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF) and IMCB (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. FMDE is actively managed, while IMCB is passively managed. Over the past year, FMDE returned 20.62% vs 23.24% for IMCB. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FMDE charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for IMCB.
Performance
FMDE vs. IMCB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMDE achieves a 10.39% return, which is significantly lower than IMCB's 14.72% return.
FMDE
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 4.14%
- YTD
- 10.39%
- 6M
- 10.80%
- 1Y
- 20.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IMCB
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 5.22%
- YTD
- 14.72%
- 6M
- 14.61%
- 1Y
- 23.24%
- 3Y*
- 17.84%
- 5Y*
- 8.81%
- 10Y*
- 11.32%
FMDE vs. IMCB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FMDE Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF | 10.39% | 12.19% | 21.76% | 8.91% |
IMCB iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 14.72% | 10.25% | 15.10% | 9.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMDE and IMCB is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023 | 0.96 |
The correlation between FMDE and IMCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
FMDE vs. IMCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FMDE
IMCB
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Technology
FMDE
IMCB
Industrials
FMDE
IMCB
Financial Services
FMDE
IMCB
Consumer Cyclical
FMDE
IMCB
Healthcare
FMDE
IMCB
Energy
FMDE
IMCB
Real Estate
FMDE
IMCB
Utilities
FMDE
IMCB
Basic Materials
FMDE
IMCB
Communication Services
FMDE
IMCB
Consumer Defensive
FMDE
IMCB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMDE vs. IMCB — Risk / Return Rank
FMDE
IMCB
FMDE vs. IMCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMDE | IMCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.32 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 2.90 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.84 | 11.50 | -1.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMDE | IMCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 1.83 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.35 | 0.50 | +0.85 |
Drawdowns
FMDE vs. IMCB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMDE drawdown since its inception was -21.10%, smaller than the maximum IMCB drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMDE and IMCB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMDE | IMCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.10% | -58.80% | +37.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.33% | -8.05% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -0.24% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.65% | -7.73% | +5.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 2.03% | +0.07% |
Volatility
FMDE vs. IMCB - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) have volatilities of 3.24% and 3.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMDE | IMCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.24% | 3.31% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.82% | 9.58% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.61% | 12.75% | +0.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 17.57% | -1.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 19.65% | -3.52% |
FMDE vs. IMCB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMDE has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCB's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FMDE vs. IMCB - Dividend Comparison
FMDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than IMCB's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMDE Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF | 1.10% | 1.23% | 1.11% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IMCB iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.43% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.08% | 1.12% | 1.32% | 1.80% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, FMDE and IMCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IMCB has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to FMDE (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMDE dropped -21.10% vs IMCB's -58.80%.
On 1-year performance, IMCB leads with 23.24% vs 20.62% for FMDE. On fees, IMCB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IMCB has performed better with a 23.24% return vs 20.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IMCB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for FMDE.
IMCB has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 1.10% for FMDE.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for FMDE and 0.04% for IMCB.
IMCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FMDE and IMCB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer