FMDE vs. FBCG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FMDE (Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF) and FBCG (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FMDE is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FBCG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FMDE returned 20.62% vs 39.38% for FBCG. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FMDE charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FBCG.

Performance

FMDE vs. FBCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMDE achieves a 10.39% return, which is significantly lower than FBCG's 15.59% return.

FMDE

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 4.14%
• YTD: 10.39%
• 6M: 10.80%
• 1Y: 20.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBCG

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: 7.84%
• YTD: 15.59%
• 6M: 15.51%
• 1Y: 39.38%
• 3Y*: 30.60%
• 5Y*: 15.84%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMDE vs. FBCG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FMDE Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF	10.39%	12.19%	21.76%	8.91%
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	15.59%	18.60%	39.05%	4.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FMDE and FBCG is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023	0.68

The correlation between FMDE and FBCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

FMDE vs. FBCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FMDE	FBCG
Technology	20.6%	48.3%
Industrials	20.1%	5.7%
Financial Services	12.9%	2.2%
Consumer Cyclical	12.1%	17.2%
Healthcare	7.8%	6.7%
Energy	6.4%	0.4%
Real Estate	5.7%	0.7%
Utilities	5.0%	0.5%
Basic Materials	3.9%	0.6%
Communication Services	3.8%	16.6%
Consumer Defensive	1.7%	1.3%

Return for Risk

FMDE vs. FBCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMDE

FMDE Risk / Return Rank: 46
FMDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
FMDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
FMDE Omega Ratio Rank: 41
FMDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
FMDE Martin Ratio Rank: 56

FBCG

FBCG Risk / Return Rank: 57
FBCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FBCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
FBCG Omega Ratio Rank: 58
FBCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
FBCG Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMDE vs. FBCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FMDE	FBCG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	2.14	-0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	2.84	-0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.36	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.49	2.61	-0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.84	10.14	-0.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FMDE vs. FBCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMDE Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the FBCG Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMDE and FBCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FMDE	FBCG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.52	2.14	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.62	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.35	0.83	+0.52

Drawdowns

FMDE vs. FBCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMDE drawdown since its inception was -21.10%, smaller than the maximum FBCG drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMDE and FBCG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMDE	FBCG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.10%	-43.56%	+22.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.33%	-15.17%	+6.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.89%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	-1.05%	+0.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.65%	-11.49%	+8.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.10%	3.90%	-1.80%

Volatility

FMDE vs. FBCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE) is 3.24%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) has a volatility of 4.79%. This indicates that FMDE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FMDE	FBCG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.24%	4.79%	-1.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.82%	13.89%	-4.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.61%	18.55%	-4.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.13%	25.79%	-9.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.13%	25.72%	-9.59%

FMDE vs. FBCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMDE has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than FBCG's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

FMDE vs. FBCG - Dividend Comparison

FMDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, more than FBCG's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	0.04%	0.05%	0.12%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%
FMDE Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF	1.10%	1.23%	1.11%	0.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FMDE and FBCG in my portfolio?

FMDE and FBCG have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FMDE or FBCG?

FBCG has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to FMDE (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMDE dropped -21.10% vs FBCG's -43.56%.

Which ETF is better, FMDE or FBCG?

On 1-year performance, FBCG leads with 39.38% vs 20.62% for FMDE. On fees, FMDE is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, FMDE has been the lower-risk option at 3.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FMDE or FBCG?

Over the 1-year period, FBCG has performed better with a 39.38% return vs 20.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FMDE or FBCG?

FMDE is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FBCG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FMDE or FBCG?

FMDE has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.04% for FBCG.

What is the main difference between FMDE and FBCG?

FMDE is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while FBCG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for FMDE and 0.59% for FBCG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.