PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMDCX vs. RSINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMDCX vs. RSINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Mid Cap Index Fund (FMDCX) and Victory RS Investors Fund (RSINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FMDCX having a 15.74% return and RSINX slightly higher at 15.77%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FMDCX having a 10.59% annualized return and RSINX not far ahead at 11.06%.


FMDCX

1D
1.12%
1M
0.00%
6M
10.21%
YTD
15.74%
1Y
22.03%
3Y*
13.62%
5Y*
8.54%
10Y*
10.59%
ALL TIME*
11.01%

RSINX

1D
1.06%
1M
6.06%
6M
11.70%
YTD
15.77%
1Y
24.09%
3Y*
15.71%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*
11.06%
ALL TIME*
8.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FMDCX vs. RSINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMDCX
Federated Hermes Mid Cap Index Fund
15.74%6.95%13.34%16.38%-13.88%25.28%13.37%25.36%-11.51%15.43%
RSINX
Victory RS Investors Fund
15.77%6.39%20.81%13.18%-2.02%25.73%-1.68%28.02%-9.55%16.36%

Correlation

The correlation between FMDCX and RSINX is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between FMDCX and RSINX has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMDCX vs. RSINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FMDCX
FMDCX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FMDCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMDCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMDCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FMDCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMDCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

RSINX
RSINX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
RSINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSINX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
RSINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSINX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FMDCX vs. RSINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Mid Cap Index Fund (FMDCX) and Victory RS Investors Fund (RSINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMDCXRSINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.37

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

2.93

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.15

10.62

+0.53

FMDCX vs. RSINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMDCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the RSINX Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMDCX and RSINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMDCX vs. RSINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMDCX drawdown since its inception was -55.36%, smaller than the maximum RSINX drawdown of -66.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMDCX and RSINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMDCXRSINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.36%

-66.11%

+10.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.75%

-8.64%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.16%

-20.23%

-3.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.16%

-23.08%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.05%

-40.86%

-1.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

0.00%

-1.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.77%

-10.48%

+3.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

2.38%

-0.12%

Volatility

FMDCX vs. RSINX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Mid Cap Index Fund (FMDCX) and Victory RS Investors Fund (RSINX) have volatilities of 3.55% and 3.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMDCXRSINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.55%

3.41%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.29%

8.19%

+3.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.22%

11.94%

+4.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.30%

18.98%

+1.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.34%

19.07%

+2.27%

FMDCX vs. RSINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMDCX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than RSINX's 1.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMDCX vs. RSINX - Dividend Comparison

FMDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.20%, more than RSINX's 3.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMDCX
Federated Hermes Mid Cap Index Fund
9.20%10.67%15.63%11.46%12.33%22.20%15.60%10.60%26.14%17.30%11.41%14.68%
RSINX
Victory RS Investors Fund
3.85%4.46%10.21%0.77%4.03%15.89%0.30%4.32%17.89%14.37%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMDCX and RSINX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMDCX has higher volatility (3.55%) compared to RSINX (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMDCX dropped -55.36% vs RSINX's -66.11%.

RSINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMDCX and RSINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer