PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMAY vs. RDVY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMAY vs. RDVY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMAY achieves a 3.87% return, which is significantly lower than RDVY's 9.04% return.


FMAY

1D
-1.68%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
3.87%
6M
4.65%
1Y
14.22%
3Y*
13.49%
5Y*
9.17%
10Y*

RDVY

1D
-1.82%
1M
0.05%
YTD
9.04%
6M
9.66%
1Y
25.81%
3Y*
19.70%
5Y*
10.85%
10Y*
15.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMAY vs. RDVY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FMAY
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May
3.87%12.69%14.45%17.83%-8.08%11.00%10.91%
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
9.04%18.90%16.41%20.38%-13.27%31.14%40.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FMAY and RDVY is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2020

0.78

The correlation between FMAY and RDVY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

FMAY vs. RDVY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FMAY
RDVY

Technology

36.2%
17.6%

Financial Services

11.9%
36.5%

Communication Services

10.9%
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
12.2%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.1%

Industrials

8.1%
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.1%

Energy

3.5%
1.4%

Utilities

2.3%
1.4%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

FMAY
36.2%
RDVY
17.6%

Financial Services

FMAY
11.9%
RDVY
36.5%

Communication Services

FMAY
10.9%
RDVY
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FMAY
10.1%
RDVY
12.2%

Healthcare

FMAY
8.4%
RDVY
8.1%

Industrials

FMAY
8.1%
RDVY
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

FMAY
4.9%
RDVY
4.1%

Energy

FMAY
3.5%
RDVY
1.4%

Utilities

FMAY
2.3%
RDVY
1.4%

Real Estate

FMAY
1.9%
RDVY

-

Basic Materials

FMAY
1.8%
RDVY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMAY vs. RDVY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMAY
FMAY Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

RDVY
RDVY Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
RDVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDVY Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
RDVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDVY Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMAY vs. RDVY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMAYRDVYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.32

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

2.87

+0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.63

12.05

+7.58

FMAY vs. RDVY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMAY Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the RDVY Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMAY and RDVY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMAYRDVYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

1.83

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.58

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.66

+0.34

Drawdowns

FMAY vs. RDVY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMAY drawdown since its inception was -13.60%, smaller than the maximum RDVY drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMAY and RDVY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMAYRDVYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.60%

-40.60%

+27.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.22%

-9.04%

+4.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.12%

-19.11%

+5.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.60%

-25.32%

+11.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.81%

-1.82%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.01%

-5.00%

+2.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.73%

2.15%

-1.42%

Volatility

FMAY vs. RDVY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY) is 2.06%, while First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) has a volatility of 4.26%. This indicates that FMAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDVY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMAYRDVYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.06%

4.26%

-2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.91%

11.13%

-6.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.28%

14.16%

-7.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.61%

18.93%

-8.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.17%

21.11%

-10.94%

FMAY vs. RDVY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMAY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than RDVY's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMAY vs. RDVY - Dividend Comparison

FMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RDVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMAY
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
0.93%1.11%1.64%2.09%2.21%1.04%1.53%1.55%1.68%1.25%2.07%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMAY and RDVY have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RDVY has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to FMAY (2.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMAY dropped -13.60% vs RDVY's -40.60%.

On 5-year performance, RDVY leads with 10.85% vs 9.17% for FMAY. On fees, RDVY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FMAY has been the lower-risk option at 2.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, RDVY has performed better with a 10.85% return vs 9.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RDVY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FMAY.

RDVY has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.00% for FMAY.

FMAY tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index May Series, while RDVY tracks NASDAQ US Rising Dividend Achievers. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FMAY and 0.50% for RDVY.

FMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMAY and RDVY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer