PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMAY vs. QUAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMAY vs. QUAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY) and iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMAY achieves a 5.65% return, which is significantly lower than QUAL's 9.65% return.


FMAY

1D
0.25%
1M
1.80%
YTD
5.65%
6M
6.55%
1Y
15.55%
3Y*
14.23%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*

QUAL

1D
0.79%
1M
4.74%
YTD
9.65%
6M
9.63%
1Y
22.18%
3Y*
20.16%
5Y*
12.13%
10Y*
14.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMAY vs. QUAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FMAY
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May
5.65%12.69%14.45%17.83%-8.08%11.00%10.91%
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
9.65%12.65%22.29%30.88%-20.50%26.94%26.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FMAY and QUAL is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2020

0.91

The correlation between FMAY and QUAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

FMAY vs. QUAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FMAY
QUAL

Technology

36.2%
36.5%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.5%

Communication Services

10.9%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
9.3%

Healthcare

8.4%
9.0%

Industrials

8.1%
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
4.0%

Utilities

2.3%
1.9%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.8%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.7%

Technology

FMAY
36.2%
QUAL
36.5%

Financial Services

FMAY
11.9%
QUAL
11.5%

Communication Services

FMAY
10.9%
QUAL
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FMAY
10.1%
QUAL
9.3%

Healthcare

FMAY
8.4%
QUAL
9.0%

Industrials

FMAY
8.1%
QUAL
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

FMAY
4.9%
QUAL
4.9%

Energy

FMAY
3.5%
QUAL
4.0%

Utilities

FMAY
2.3%
QUAL
1.9%

Real Estate

FMAY
1.9%
QUAL
1.8%

Basic Materials

FMAY
1.8%
QUAL
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMAY vs. QUAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMAY
FMAY Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

QUAL
QUAL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
QUAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUAL Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QUAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUAL Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMAY vs. QUAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY) and iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMAYQUALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.33

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

2.47

+1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.75

11.25

+10.49

FMAY vs. QUAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMAY Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the QUAL Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMAY and QUAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMAYQUALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

1.88

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.70

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

0.80

+0.22

Drawdowns

FMAY vs. QUAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMAY drawdown since its inception was -13.60%, smaller than the maximum QUAL drawdown of -34.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMAY and QUAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMAYQUALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.60%

-34.06%

+20.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.22%

-9.03%

+4.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.12%

-18.00%

+4.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.60%

-28.23%

+14.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

0.00%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.01%

-4.10%

+2.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

1.98%

-1.26%

Volatility

FMAY vs. QUAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY) is 1.03%, while iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) has a volatility of 2.54%. This indicates that FMAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QUAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMAYQUALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

2.54%

-1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.59%

9.06%

-4.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.04%

11.84%

-5.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.59%

17.33%

-6.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.14%

18.09%

-7.95%

FMAY vs. QUAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMAY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than QUAL's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMAY vs. QUAL - Dividend Comparison

FMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QUAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMAY
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
0.87%0.94%1.02%1.23%1.59%1.20%1.39%1.60%2.00%1.76%1.96%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMAY and QUAL have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QUAL has higher volatility (2.54%) compared to FMAY (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMAY dropped -13.60% vs QUAL's -34.06%.

On 5-year performance, QUAL leads with 12.13% vs 9.54% for FMAY. On fees, QUAL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FMAY has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QUAL has performed better with a 12.13% return vs 9.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QUAL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FMAY.

QUAL has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.00% for FMAY.

FMAY tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index May Series, while QUAL tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FMAY and 0.15% for QUAL.

FMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMAY and QUAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer