PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMAY vs. PSCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FMAY vs. PSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FMAY vs. PSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FMAY
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May
-1.22%12.69%14.45%17.83%-8.08%11.00%0.31%
PSCX
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF
-1.88%12.08%13.27%16.57%-7.35%9.03%0.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMAY achieves a -1.22% return, which is significantly higher than PSCX's -1.88% return.


FMAY

1D
1.96%
1M
-2.08%
YTD
-1.22%
6M
1.06%
1Y
14.34%
3Y*
12.76%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*

PSCX

1D
1.43%
1M
-2.32%
YTD
-1.88%
6M
0.91%
1Y
12.02%
3Y*
11.44%
5Y*
7.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FMAY vs. PSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMAY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FMAY vs. PSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMAY
FMAY Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

PSCX
PSCX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
PSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMAY vs. PSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMAYPSCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.23

1.37

-0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.89

2.05

-0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.32

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

1.99

-0.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.81

10.21

-0.40

FMAY vs. PSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMAY Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the PSCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMAY and PSCX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMAYPSCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

1.37

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

1.04

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

1.10

-0.18

Correlation

The correlation between FMAY and PSCX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FMAY vs. PSCX - Dividend Comparison

Neither FMAY nor PSCX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FMAY vs. PSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMAY drawdown since its inception was -13.60%, which is greater than PSCX's maximum drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMAY and PSCX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FMAYPSCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.60%

-10.20%

-3.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.88%

-6.15%

-2.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.60%

-10.20%

-3.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.34%

-2.84%

+0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.06%

-1.92%

-0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

1.20%

+0.33%

Volatility

FMAY vs. PSCX - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY) has a higher volatility of 3.48% compared to Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) at 2.81%. This indicates that FMAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FMAYPSCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

2.81%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.81%

4.31%

+0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.68%

8.83%

+2.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.56%

7.06%

+3.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.26%

7.02%

+3.24%