FMAY vs. BUFH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FMAY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index May Series, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FMAY charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.

Performance

FMAY vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMAY achieves a 5.39% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.45% return.

FMAY

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 1.63%
• YTD: 5.39%
• 6M: 6.32%
• 1Y: 15.38%
• 3Y*: 14.13%
• 5Y*: 9.48%
• 10Y*: —

BUFH

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 2.45%
• 6M: 2.82%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMAY vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May	5.39%	8.00%
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF	2.45%	3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between FMAY and BUFH is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.73

Return for Risk

FMAY vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMAY

FMAY Risk / Return Rank: 83
FMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
FMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 87
FMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMAY vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FMAY	BUFH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.56	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.80	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.66	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.48	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FMAY	BUFH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.56	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.02	2.91	-1.89

Drawdowns

FMAY vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMAY drawdown since its inception was -13.60%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMAY and BUFH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMAY	BUFH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.60%	-1.53%	-12.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.22%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.38%	-0.05%	-0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.01%	-0.18%	-1.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.72%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FMAY	BUFH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.02%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.59%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.04%	2.37%	+3.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.59%	2.37%	+8.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.15%	2.37%	+7.78%

FMAY vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMAY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

FMAY vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison

Neither FMAY nor BUFH has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FMAY and BUFH in my portfolio?

FMAY and BUFH have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FMAY or BUFH?

On fees, FMAY is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FMAY or BUFH?

FMAY is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FMAY or BUFH?

FMAY and BUFH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FMAY and BUFH?

FMAY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FMAY and 0.95% for BUFH.