PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMAT vs. XLBI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMAT vs. XLBI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT) and State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLBI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMAT achieves a 9.50% return, which is significantly higher than XLBI's 7.51% return.


FMAT

1D
0.25%
1M
-4.75%
6M
0.57%
YTD
9.50%
1Y
15.68%
3Y*
8.80%
5Y*
6.85%
10Y*
9.50%

XLBI

1D
0.44%
1M
-2.14%
6M
4.80%
YTD
7.51%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMAT vs. XLBI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FMAT and XLBI is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

0.95

FMAT vs. XLBI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FMAT
XLBI

Basic Materials

89.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%

-

Energy

0.5%

-

Healthcare

0.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.1%

-

Technology

0.1%

-

Industrials

0.1%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Financial Services

-

98.9%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

FMAT
89.9%
XLBI

-

Consumer Cyclical

FMAT
8.7%
XLBI

-

Energy

FMAT
0.5%
XLBI

-

Healthcare

FMAT
0.5%
XLBI

-

Consumer Defensive

FMAT
0.1%
XLBI

-

Technology

FMAT
0.1%
XLBI

-

Industrials

FMAT
0.1%
XLBI

-

Communication Services

FMAT

-

XLBI

-

Financial Services

FMAT

-

XLBI
98.9%

Real Estate

FMAT

-

XLBI

-

Utilities

FMAT

-

XLBI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMAT vs. XLBI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMAT
FMAT Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FMAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FMAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMAT Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

XLBI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMAT vs. XLBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT) and State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMATXLBIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.49

FMAT vs. XLBI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMAT vs. XLBI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMAT drawdown since its inception was -41.11%, which is greater than XLBI's maximum drawdown of -10.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMAT and XLBI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMATXLBIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.11%

-10.62%

-30.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.98%

-2.14%

-4.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.86%

-2.11%

-4.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.50%

Volatility

FMAT vs. XLBI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMATXLBIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.50%

13.86%

+4.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.71%

13.86%

+5.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.18%

13.86%

+7.32%

FMAT vs. XLBI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMAT has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XLBI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMAT vs. XLBI - Dividend Comparison

FMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than XLBI's 14.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMAT
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF
1.45%1.64%1.68%1.71%2.00%1.44%1.73%1.89%2.18%1.53%1.78%2.16%
XLBI
State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
14.88%7.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FMAT and XLBI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, FMAT is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FMAT is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLBI.

XLBI has the higher dividend yield at 14.88%, compared with 1.45% for FMAT.

FMAT is categorized as Materials, while XLBI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FMAT and 0.35% for XLBI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMAT and XLBI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer