FMAT vs. PICK

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FMAT (Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF) and PICK (iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF) are both Materials funds - FMAT tracks the MSCI USA IMI Materials Index while PICK tracks the MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers Ex Gold & Silver Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FMAT returned 10.33%/yr vs 17.67%/yr for PICK. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FMAT charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for PICK.

Performance

FMAT vs. PICK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT) and iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMAT achieves a 13.04% return, which is significantly lower than PICK's 30.58% return. Over the past 10 years, FMAT has underperformed PICK with an annualized return of 10.33%, while PICK has yielded a comparatively higher 17.67% annualized return.

FMAT

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 2.43%
• YTD: 13.04%
• 6M: 16.00%
• 1Y: 22.50%
• 3Y*: 12.38%
• 5Y*: 5.79%
• 10Y*: 10.33%

PICK

• 1D: -2.74%
• 1M: 11.27%
• YTD: 30.58%
• 6M: 38.84%
• 1Y: 88.13%
• 3Y*: 22.92%
• 5Y*: 11.78%
• 10Y*: 17.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMAT vs. PICK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FMAT Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF	13.04%	12.11%	0.47%	13.71%	-11.54%	27.45%	19.57%	23.35%	-17.40%	23.51%
PICK iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF	30.58%	51.89%	-16.37%	9.69%	2.54%	22.61%	27.46%	16.47%	-18.65%	38.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FMAT and PICK is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013	0.73

The correlation between FMAT and PICK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

FMAT vs. PICK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FMAT	PICK
Basic Materials	90.1%	96.6%
Consumer Cyclical	8.3%	-
Energy	0.6%	0.6%
Healthcare	0.5%	-
Industrials	0.1%	1.1%
Consumer Defensive	0.1%	0.1%
Technology	0.1%	1.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.1%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FMAT vs. PICK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMAT

FMAT Risk / Return Rank: 34
FMAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
FMAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
FMAT Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FMAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
FMAT Martin Ratio Rank: 35

PICK

PICK Risk / Return Rank: 84
PICK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
PICK Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
PICK Omega Ratio Rank: 83
PICK Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
PICK Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMAT vs. PICK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT) and iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FMAT	PICK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.28	3.16	-1.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.85	3.63	-1.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.51	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	4.53	-2.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.51	18.20	-12.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FMAT vs. PICK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMAT Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the PICK Sharpe Ratio of 3.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMAT and PICK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FMAT	PICK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.28	3.16	-1.87
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	0.43	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	0.62	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.21	+0.23

Drawdowns

FMAT vs. PICK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMAT drawdown since its inception was -41.11%, smaller than the maximum PICK drawdown of -68.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMAT and PICK.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMAT	PICK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.11%	-68.87%	+27.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.48%	-19.54%	+6.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.17%	-32.52%	+9.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.40%	-36.37%	+10.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.11%	-52.72%	+11.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.97%	-2.74%	-1.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.87%	-24.12%	+17.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.09%	4.86%	-0.77%

Volatility

FMAT vs. PICK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT) is 6.14%, while iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) has a volatility of 10.99%. This indicates that FMAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PICK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FMAT	PICK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.14%	10.99%	-4.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.95%	24.11%	-10.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.66%	28.10%	-10.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.60%	27.78%	-8.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.19%	28.37%	-7.18%

FMAT vs. PICK - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMAT has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PICK's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

FMAT vs. PICK - Dividend Comparison

FMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than PICK's 2.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FMAT Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF	1.42%	1.64%	1.68%	1.71%	2.00%	1.44%	1.73%	1.89%	2.18%	1.53%	1.78%	2.16%
PICK iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF	2.20%	2.88%	3.26%	4.19%	6.93%	5.89%	2.27%	5.51%	4.77%	2.41%	1.15%	15.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FMAT and PICK in my portfolio?

FMAT and PICK have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FMAT or PICK?

PICK has higher volatility (10.99%) compared to FMAT (6.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMAT dropped -41.11% vs PICK's -68.87%.

Which ETF is better, FMAT or PICK?

On 10-year performance, PICK leads with 17.67% vs 10.33% for FMAT. On fees, FMAT is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FMAT has been the lower-risk option at 6.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FMAT or PICK?

Over the 10-year period, PICK has performed better with a 17.67% return vs 10.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FMAT or PICK?

FMAT is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PICK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FMAT or PICK?

PICK has the higher dividend yield at 2.20%, compared with 1.42% for FMAT.

What is the main difference between FMAT and PICK?

FMAT tracks MSCI USA IMI Materials Index, while PICK tracks MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers Ex Gold & Silver Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FMAT and 0.39% for PICK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PICK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.